Sian January wrote: > The testing cycle for r710036 [1] has been completed and the test > results have been discussed [2]. > > Two bug fixes [3,4] have been committed since r710036 that we want to > include in M8. r711744 has not been through the extended testing > cycle, but has been through the standard integrity testing cycle with > the same results as r710036.[5]
Where are the r711744 builds? I don't see them on the snapshots download page. We have to vote on the actual archive bundle, not just a SVN tag. I'd like to take a look and do a final sanity check. Regards, Tim > As usual there are some long-standing issues and a few new ones, but > nothing that has been considederd critical so far. Overall the pass > rate is better than M7. > > If anyone thinks that a particular issue is a blocker for M8 please say so > here. > > Otherwise, shall we declare r711744 as M8 and unfreeze the code base? > > [1] http://people.apache.org/~chunrong/snapshots/r710036/index.html > > [2] http://markmail.org/message/l72lba7xehacqyku > > [3] http://markmail.org/message/6fxgpa2azv27zsol > > [4] http://markmail.org/message/ljqwytbegtsfou2g > > [5] http://people.apache.org/~chunrong/harmony-integrity/ >
