Chunrong, are you able to make these available? 2008/11/10 Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Sian January wrote: >> The testing cycle for r710036 [1] has been completed and the test >> results have been discussed [2]. >> >> Two bug fixes [3,4] have been committed since r710036 that we want to >> include in M8. r711744 has not been through the extended testing >> cycle, but has been through the standard integrity testing cycle with >> the same results as r710036.[5] > > Where are the r711744 builds? I don't see them on the snapshots > download page. > > We have to vote on the actual archive bundle, not just a SVN tag. > I'd like to take a look and do a final sanity check. > > Regards, > Tim > >> As usual there are some long-standing issues and a few new ones, but >> nothing that has been considederd critical so far. Overall the pass >> rate is better than M7. >> >> If anyone thinks that a particular issue is a blocker for M8 please say so >> here. >> >> Otherwise, shall we declare r711744 as M8 and unfreeze the code base? >> >> [1] http://people.apache.org/~chunrong/snapshots/r710036/index.html >> >> [2] http://markmail.org/message/l72lba7xehacqyku >> >> [3] http://markmail.org/message/6fxgpa2azv27zsol >> >> [4] http://markmail.org/message/ljqwytbegtsfou2g >> >> [5] http://people.apache.org/~chunrong/harmony-integrity/ >> >
-- Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
