Got it -- thanks. Can anyone else reproduce HARMONY-6013 [1] ? It works for me with a simple test, but if others see a failure that would be a pretty bad regression...
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6013 Regards, Tim chunrong lai wrote: > Thanks. I am uploading the snapshots. > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Sian January <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> Chunrong, are you able to make these available? >> >> 2008/11/10 Tim Ellison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> > Sian January wrote: >>>> The testing cycle for r710036 [1] has been completed and the test >>>> results have been discussed [2]. >>>> >>>> Two bug fixes [3,4] have been committed since r710036 that we want to >>>> include in M8. r711744 has not been through the extended testing >>>> cycle, but has been through the standard integrity testing cycle with >>>> the same results as r710036.[5] >>> Where are the r711744 builds? I don't see them on the snapshots >>> download page. >>> >>> We have to vote on the actual archive bundle, not just a SVN tag. >>> I'd like to take a look and do a final sanity check. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Tim >>> >>>> As usual there are some long-standing issues and a few new ones, but >>>> nothing that has been considederd critical so far. Overall the pass >>>> rate is better than M7. >>>> >>>> If anyone thinks that a particular issue is a blocker for M8 please say >> so here. >>>> Otherwise, shall we declare r711744 as M8 and unfreeze the code base? >>>> >>>> [1] http://people.apache.org/~chunrong/snapshots/r710036/index.html >>>> >>>> [2] http://markmail.org/message/l72lba7xehacqyku >>>> >>>> [3] http://markmail.org/message/6fxgpa2azv27zsol >>>> >>>> [4] http://markmail.org/message/ljqwytbegtsfou2g >>>> >>>> [5] http://people.apache.org/~chunrong/harmony-integrity/ >>>> >> >> >> -- >> Unless stated otherwise above: >> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number >> 741598. >> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU >> >
