can anyone who knows details start filing jira and mark the version to "2.0.1.0-incubating" or backlog?
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:56 PM Hubert Zhang <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 This is a legacy problem. Clear GUCs including "GP" may be the first > step. > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Wen Lin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > It's definitely a good thing, but needs very careful thought on effects > to > > customers. > > We can try to list these effects as much as possile. > > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Yi Jin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I think it is a must-do, but some concerns of customer using convention > > and > > > legacy applications, scripts etc. > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 1:44 PM, 陶征霖 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Good idea, but need quite a lot of effort and may also affect > custormer > > > > behavior. Should handle it carefully. > > > > > > > > 2016-07-13 9:54 GMT+08:00 Ivan Weng <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > > Agree with this good idea. But as Paul said, there are maybe > already > > > many > > > > > users use greeenplum_path.sh or something else in their > environment. > > So > > > > we > > > > > need to think about it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Ivan > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Paul Guo <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I've asked this before. Seems that affects some old users. I'm > not > > > sure > > > > > > about the details. > > > > > > I agree that we should change it to a better name in a release. > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-07-13 9:25 GMT+08:00 Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected] > >: > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Xiang Sheng < > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Agree . @xunzhang. > > > > > > > > However , some greenplum strings can be easily replaced , but > > > there > > > > > are > > > > > > > too > > > > > > > > many in the code or comments. Changing all of them costs too > > > much > > > > > > > efforts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So changing the strings that users can see is enough. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Huge +1 to this! Btw, is this something we may be able to > tackle > > in > > > > our > > > > > > > next Apache release? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > Roman. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Thanks, > > > > Zhenglin > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Thanks > > Hubert Zhang >
