Thanks, I've update the JIRA with more info and corrected versions. I think we have the consensus that this needs to be done. Please add more details in the JIRA or add tasks as appropriate.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:33 AM Lisa Owen <[email protected]> wrote: > there is an existing JIRA related to renaming greenplum references: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-902 > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Ting(Goden) Yao <[email protected]> wrote: > > > can anyone who knows details start filing jira and mark the version to > > "2.0.1.0-incubating" or backlog? > > > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:56 PM Hubert Zhang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > +1 This is a legacy problem. Clear GUCs including "GP" may be the first > > > step. > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Wen Lin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > It's definitely a good thing, but needs very careful thought on > effects > > > to > > > > customers. > > > > We can try to list these effects as much as possile. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Yi Jin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I think it is a must-do, but some concerns of customer using > > convention > > > > and > > > > > legacy applications, scripts etc. > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 1:44 PM, 陶征霖 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Good idea, but need quite a lot of effort and may also affect > > > custormer > > > > > > behavior. Should handle it carefully. > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-07-13 9:54 GMT+08:00 Ivan Weng <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Agree with this good idea. But as Paul said, there are maybe > > > already > > > > > many > > > > > > > users use greeenplum_path.sh or something else in their > > > environment. > > > > So > > > > > > we > > > > > > > need to think about it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > Ivan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Paul Guo <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've asked this before. Seems that affects some old users. > I'm > > > not > > > > > sure > > > > > > > > about the details. > > > > > > > > I agree that we should change it to a better name in a > release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2016-07-13 9:25 GMT+08:00 Roman Shaposhnik < > > [email protected] > > > >: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Xiang Sheng < > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Agree . @xunzhang. > > > > > > > > > > However , some greenplum strings can be easily replaced , > > but > > > > > there > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > too > > > > > > > > > > many in the code or comments. Changing all of them costs > > too > > > > > much > > > > > > > > > efforts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So changing the strings that users can see is enough. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Huge +1 to this! Btw, is this something we may be able to > > > tackle > > > > in > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > next Apache release? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > Roman. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Zhenglin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Thanks > > > > > > Hubert Zhang > > > > > >
