-1 (Sorry). We need HBASE-2986. Without it client hangs if a split in the midst of a put.
Otherwise, I'd already checked it out -- doc looks good, ran under load on a cluster -- and would have +1'd it only for your calling out the absence of HBASE-2986 J-D. St.Ack On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jdcry...@apache.org> wrote: > The 0.89.20100830 DR branch was cancelled, here's the new RC off a new branch. > > As discussed, this release candidate contains a revert of HBASE-2694 > which means that it is back on the "very" old master. It is also very > similar to what we run here in production. > > Sources and binaries can be found here: > > http://people.apache.org/~jdcryans/hbase-0.89.20100924-candidate-1/ > > Documentation: > > http://people.apache.org/~jdcryans/hbase-0.89.20100924-candidate-1/hbase-0.89.20100924/docs/ > > Here's the list of everything I added since moving from 0830: > > HBASE-3008 Memstore.updateColumnValue passes wrong flag to heapSizeChange > HBASE-3035 Bandaid for HBASE-2990 > HBASE-2643 Figure how to deal with eof splitting logs > HBASE-2941 port HADOOP-6713 - threading scalability for RPC reads - to HBase > HBASE-3006 Reading compressed HFile blocks causes way too many DFS RPC calls > severly impacting performance > HBASE-2989 [replication] RSM won't cleanup after locking if 0 peers > HBASE-2992 [replication] MalformedObjectNameException in ReplicationMetrics > HBASE-3034 Revert the regions assignment part of HBASE-2694 (and > pals) for 0.89 > HBASE-3033 [replication] ReplicationSink.replicateEntries improvements > HBASE-2997 Performance fixes - profiler driven > HBASE-2889 Tool to look at HLogs -- parse and tail -f (patch #2 only) > > Unfortunately I forgot to add HBASE-2986 like Stack asked (sorry, I > just figured it while reading the old voting thread). > > Should we release this as the next "Development Release"? Please cast > your vote by Wednesday, September 29th. > > Thanks, > > The HBase Team >
