My vote is obviously +1, although we hit a bug this weekend regarding HBASE-3008 (for which we'll post a patch soon). Over time, the memstore size of regions with ICVs grows negative, which means that those regions can't flush and when you close them you basically lose all the data since the last flush (since on close it won't flush either). We solved this by disabling ICVs to those tables (basically setting the async ICV queues in the thrift servers to -1), copied the data to another cluster, restarted the cluster with the fix, re-imported the data, then re-enabled the ICVs.
I don't think this is a blocker for a DR, as it only affects users doing only tons of ICVs on particular tables, but it should be disclosed somewhere. J-D On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans <jdcry...@apache.org> wrote: > The 0.89.20100830 DR branch was cancelled, here's the new RC off a new branch. > > As discussed, this release candidate contains a revert of HBASE-2694 > which means that it is back on the "very" old master. It is also very > similar to what we run here in production. > > Sources and binaries can be found here: > > http://people.apache.org/~jdcryans/hbase-0.89.20100924-candidate-1/ > > Documentation: > > http://people.apache.org/~jdcryans/hbase-0.89.20100924-candidate-1/hbase-0.89.20100924/docs/ > > Here's the list of everything I added since moving from 0830: > > HBASE-3008 Memstore.updateColumnValue passes wrong flag to heapSizeChange > HBASE-3035 Bandaid for HBASE-2990 > HBASE-2643 Figure how to deal with eof splitting logs > HBASE-2941 port HADOOP-6713 - threading scalability for RPC reads - to HBase > HBASE-3006 Reading compressed HFile blocks causes way too many DFS RPC calls > severly impacting performance > HBASE-2989 [replication] RSM won't cleanup after locking if 0 peers > HBASE-2992 [replication] MalformedObjectNameException in ReplicationMetrics > HBASE-3034 Revert the regions assignment part of HBASE-2694 (and > pals) for 0.89 > HBASE-3033 [replication] ReplicationSink.replicateEntries improvements > HBASE-2997 Performance fixes - profiler driven > HBASE-2889 Tool to look at HLogs -- parse and tail -f (patch #2 only) > > Unfortunately I forgot to add HBASE-2986 like Stack asked (sorry, I > just figured it while reading the old voting thread). > > Should we release this as the next "Development Release"? Please cast > your vote by Wednesday, September 29th. > > Thanks, > > The HBase Team >
