+0 from me - I did some brief testing but not quite enough for a full +1. Was testing on a new cluster and I had forgotten to set up ulimit, so it exploded after a few hours. Will upgrade to a +1 later this week if I have time to run a longer test.
-Todd On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Cosmin Lehene <cleh...@adobe.com> wrote: > +1 > I tested the build over the weekend running MR jobs and some write > performance testing. It looks good. > > Cosmin > > On Sep 25, 2010, at 2:38 AM, Stack wrote: > > > Changing my vote after J-D and I did a bit of digging. HBASE-2986 is > > a fix for HBASE-1845, the issue that added multi*; i.e. multiget, > > multidelete, etc. This 0.89 was cut from the branch before hbase-1845 > > was applied. > > > > +1 > > > > St.Ack > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > >> -1 (Sorry). We need HBASE-2986. Without it client hangs if a split > >> in the midst of a put. > >> > >> Otherwise, I'd already checked it out -- doc looks good, ran under > >> load on a cluster -- and would have +1'd it only for your calling out > >> the absence of HBASE-2986 J-D. > >> > >> St.Ack > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Jean-Daniel Cryans < > jdcry...@apache.org> wrote: > >>> The 0.89.20100830 DR branch was cancelled, here's the new RC off a new > branch. > >>> > >>> As discussed, this release candidate contains a revert of HBASE-2694 > >>> which means that it is back on the "very" old master. It is also very > >>> similar to what we run here in production. > >>> > >>> Sources and binaries can be found here: > >>> > >>> http://people.apache.org/~jdcryans/hbase-0.89.20100924-candidate-1/ > >>> > >>> Documentation: > >>> > >>> > http://people.apache.org/~jdcryans/hbase-0.89.20100924-candidate-1/hbase-0.89.20100924/docs/ > >>> > >>> Here's the list of everything I added since moving from 0830: > >>> > >>> HBASE-3008 Memstore.updateColumnValue passes wrong flag to > heapSizeChange > >>> HBASE-3035 Bandaid for HBASE-2990 > >>> HBASE-2643 Figure how to deal with eof splitting logs > >>> HBASE-2941 port HADOOP-6713 - threading scalability for RPC reads - > to HBase > >>> HBASE-3006 Reading compressed HFile blocks causes way too many DFS > RPC calls > >>> severly impacting performance > >>> HBASE-2989 [replication] RSM won't cleanup after locking if 0 peers > >>> HBASE-2992 [replication] MalformedObjectNameException in > ReplicationMetrics > >>> HBASE-3034 Revert the regions assignment part of HBASE-2694 (and > >>> pals) for 0.89 > >>> HBASE-3033 [replication] ReplicationSink.replicateEntries > improvements > >>> HBASE-2997 Performance fixes - profiler driven > >>> HBASE-2889 Tool to look at HLogs -- parse and tail -f (patch #2 only) > >>> > >>> Unfortunately I forgot to add HBASE-2986 like Stack asked (sorry, I > >>> just figured it while reading the old voting thread). > >>> > >>> Should we release this as the next "Development Release"? Please cast > >>> your vote by Wednesday, September 29th. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> > >>> The HBase Team > >>> > >> > > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera
