Thanks St.Ack! Joep -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stack Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 12:12 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Branching for 0.92 [WAS -> Re: [DISCUSSION] Accumulo, another BigTable clone, has shown up on Apache Incubator as a proposal]
I was sort of waiting on a clean build to TRUNK before branching. I think we should be there in next hour or so. I'll branch this evening or by tomorrow morning. That OK w/ you Joep? St.Ack On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Rottinghuis, Joep <[email protected]> wrote: > Any update on the 0.92 branch getting cut? > > Cheers, > > Joep > ________________________________________ > From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stack > [[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 8:42 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Branching for 0.92 [WAS -> Re: [DISCUSSION] Accumulo, another > BigTable clone, has shown up on Apache Incubator as a proposal] > > I'd like to propose branching friday week, the 16th. Hopefully that > will might get folks to focus on these last outstanding issues (of > which there are quite a few). > > Thereafter we need to work on stabilization which I'm sure will turn > up at least one bug, maybe two (smile). Stabilization will run for a > good while I'd say and will take some effort all around. Only bug > fixes should go into 0.92 branch (J-D might have to tie me to the > mast). > > Should we discuss in a separate whether to pull in security? > > St.Ack > > > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: >> I also agreed at the time to hold off refactoring the build for Maven >> modules and supporting RPC engine variants. I would still have the same >> opinion if not for recent events. >> >> How much work remains for 0.92? If more than a few week's worth, then a >> parallel refactor of the build could happen, with a final merge step. >> >> Best regards, >> >> - Andy >> >> On Tue Sep 6th, 2011 12:02 PM PDT Gary Helmling wrote: >> >>>> Seems like committing it will disrupt the build and src tree layout. >>>> Gary was holding off till we branched but 0.92 branching is taking >>>> too long. >>>> >>>> + Lets branch this friday, or next? >>>> + And or, run a vote on whether we should commit security now >>>> + before >>>> we branch or after >>>> >>>> >>> >>>This is getting off topic for the current thread, so I'll open a new >>>thread to take a vote on converting trunk back in to maven modules. >>>This is what would be necessary to integrate the various security bits. >>> >>>The last discussion we had on this was on the dev list at the end of >>>May/beginning of June: >>>http://search-hadoop.com/m/iXZmd2aZwBE1 >>> >>>I agreed as much as anyone that we should hold off until after >>>branching >>>0.92 in order to avoid the disruption of moving the entire source >>>tree around. So I have been holding off on this on my own discretion >>>and any delay sits mostly with me. >>> >>>Of course, that was three months ago and we still haven't branched. >>>In hindsight, if we were aware how long the 0.92 process would go on, >>>I think the thread might have reached a different conclusion. In any >>>case, I think it warrants another discussion. >>> >>>--gh >> >>
