You should be able to pretty easily set in in the pom (under properties), and then just use in the <version> tag.
That way whenever you want to to bump version numbers, its one easy change. -Jesse Yates On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 8:47 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > I changed versions. How would you make hbase.version work? Looks > like you can't set project.version. I could change it to > ${hbase.version} but then how to do the default value? > St.Ack > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Rottinghuis, Joep > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Trunk should probably go to get a newer version as well (0.93?) > > Can you make the version a property that I can override using > -Dhbase.version=0.92-my-own-name? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Joep > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Stack > > Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 8:23 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Branching for 0.92 [WAS -> Re: [DISCUSSION] Accumulo, > another BigTable clone, has shown up on Apache Incubator as a proposal] > > > > That makes sense. Let me make the change. > > St.Ack > > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Rottinghuis, Joep < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Michael, > >> > >> Should the version in the pom on the 0.92 branch point to > 0.92.0-SNAPSHOT? > >> If so I can file a bug and supply patch for same. > >> Or are you updating that only when you get ready for a release? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Joep > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Rottinghuis, Joep [mailto:[email protected]] > >> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 6:02 PM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: RE: Branching for 0.92 [WAS -> Re: [DISCUSSION] Accumulo, > >> another BigTable clone, has shown up on Apache Incubator as a > >> proposal] > >> > >> Thanks St.Ack! > >> > >> Joep > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > >> Stack > >> Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 12:12 PM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Subject: Re: Branching for 0.92 [WAS -> Re: [DISCUSSION] Accumulo, > >> another BigTable clone, has shown up on Apache Incubator as a > >> proposal] > >> > >> I was sort of waiting on a clean build to TRUNK before branching. I > think we should be there in next hour or so. I'll branch this evening or by > tomorrow morning. That OK w/ you Joep? > >> > >> St.Ack > >> > >> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Rottinghuis, Joep < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>> Any update on the 0.92 branch getting cut? > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> > >>> Joep > >>> ________________________________________ > >>> From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stack > >>> [[email protected]] > >>> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 8:42 PM > >>> To: [email protected] > >>> Subject: Branching for 0.92 [WAS -> Re: [DISCUSSION] Accumulo, > >>> another BigTable clone, has shown up on Apache Incubator as a > >>> proposal] > >>> > >>> I'd like to propose branching friday week, the 16th. Hopefully that > >>> will might get folks to focus on these last outstanding issues (of > >>> which there are quite a few). > >>> > >>> Thereafter we need to work on stabilization which I'm sure will turn > >>> up at least one bug, maybe two (smile). Stabilization will run for a > >>> good while I'd say and will take some effort all around. Only bug > >>> fixes should go into 0.92 branch (J-D might have to tie me to the > >>> mast). > >>> > >>> Should we discuss in a separate whether to pull in security? > >>> > >>> St.Ack > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>> I also agreed at the time to hold off refactoring the build for Maven > modules and supporting RPC engine variants. I would still have the same > opinion if not for recent events. > >>>> > >>>> How much work remains for 0.92? If more than a few week's worth, then > a parallel refactor of the build could happen, with a final merge step. > >>>> > >>>> Best regards, > >>>> > >>>> - Andy > >>>> > >>>> On Tue Sep 6th, 2011 12:02 PM PDT Gary Helmling wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>> Seems like committing it will disrupt the build and src tree layout. > >>>>>> Gary was holding off till we branched but 0.92 branching is taking > >>>>>> too long. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> + Lets branch this friday, or next? > >>>>>> + And or, run a vote on whether we should commit security now > >>>>>> + before > >>>>>> we branch or after > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>This is getting off topic for the current thread, so I'll open a new > >>>>>thread to take a vote on converting trunk back in to maven modules. > >>>>>This is what would be necessary to integrate the various security > bits. > >>>>> > >>>>>The last discussion we had on this was on the dev list at the end of > >>>>>May/beginning of June: > >>>>>http://search-hadoop.com/m/iXZmd2aZwBE1 > >>>>> > >>>>>I agreed as much as anyone that we should hold off until after > >>>>>branching > >>>>>0.92 in order to avoid the disruption of moving the entire source > >>>>>tree around. So I have been holding off on this on my own > >>>>>discretion and any delay sits mostly with me. > >>>>> > >>>>>Of course, that was three months ago and we still haven't branched. > >>>>>In hindsight, if we were aware how long the 0.92 process would go > >>>>>on, I think the thread might have reached a different conclusion. > >>>>>In any case, I think it warrants another discussion. > >>>>> > >>>>>--gh > >>>> > >>>> > >> > > >
