I changed versions. How would you make hbase.version work? Looks
like you can't set project.version. I could change it to
${hbase.version} but then how to do the default value?
St.Ack
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Rottinghuis, Joep
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Trunk should probably go to get a newer version as well (0.93?)
> Can you make the version a property that I can override using
> -Dhbase.version=0.92-my-own-name?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joep
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stack
> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 8:23 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Branching for 0.92 [WAS -> Re: [DISCUSSION] Accumulo, another
> BigTable clone, has shown up on Apache Incubator as a proposal]
>
> That makes sense. Let me make the change.
> St.Ack
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Rottinghuis, Joep <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> Michael,
>>
>> Should the version in the pom on the 0.92 branch point to 0.92.0-SNAPSHOT?
>> If so I can file a bug and supply patch for same.
>> Or are you updating that only when you get ready for a release?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Joep
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Rottinghuis, Joep [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 6:02 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: RE: Branching for 0.92 [WAS -> Re: [DISCUSSION] Accumulo,
>> another BigTable clone, has shown up on Apache Incubator as a
>> proposal]
>>
>> Thanks St.Ack!
>>
>> Joep
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
>> Stack
>> Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 12:12 PM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: Branching for 0.92 [WAS -> Re: [DISCUSSION] Accumulo,
>> another BigTable clone, has shown up on Apache Incubator as a
>> proposal]
>>
>> I was sort of waiting on a clean build to TRUNK before branching. I think
>> we should be there in next hour or so. I'll branch this evening or by
>> tomorrow morning. That OK w/ you Joep?
>>
>> St.Ack
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Rottinghuis, Joep <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> Any update on the 0.92 branch getting cut?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Joep
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stack
>>> [[email protected]]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 8:42 PM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Branching for 0.92 [WAS -> Re: [DISCUSSION] Accumulo,
>>> another BigTable clone, has shown up on Apache Incubator as a
>>> proposal]
>>>
>>> I'd like to propose branching friday week, the 16th. Hopefully that
>>> will might get folks to focus on these last outstanding issues (of
>>> which there are quite a few).
>>>
>>> Thereafter we need to work on stabilization which I'm sure will turn
>>> up at least one bug, maybe two (smile). Stabilization will run for a
>>> good while I'd say and will take some effort all around. Only bug
>>> fixes should go into 0.92 branch (J-D might have to tie me to the
>>> mast).
>>>
>>> Should we discuss in a separate whether to pull in security?
>>>
>>> St.Ack
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> I also agreed at the time to hold off refactoring the build for Maven
>>>> modules and supporting RPC engine variants. I would still have the same
>>>> opinion if not for recent events.
>>>>
>>>> How much work remains for 0.92? If more than a few week's worth, then a
>>>> parallel refactor of the build could happen, with a final merge step.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> - Andy
>>>>
>>>> On Tue Sep 6th, 2011 12:02 PM PDT Gary Helmling wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Seems like committing it will disrupt the build and src tree layout.
>>>>>> Gary was holding off till we branched but 0.92 branching is taking
>>>>>> too long.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> + Lets branch this friday, or next?
>>>>>> + And or, run a vote on whether we should commit security now
>>>>>> + before
>>>>>> we branch or after
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>This is getting off topic for the current thread, so I'll open a new
>>>>>thread to take a vote on converting trunk back in to maven modules.
>>>>>This is what would be necessary to integrate the various security bits.
>>>>>
>>>>>The last discussion we had on this was on the dev list at the end of
>>>>>May/beginning of June:
>>>>>http://search-hadoop.com/m/iXZmd2aZwBE1
>>>>>
>>>>>I agreed as much as anyone that we should hold off until after
>>>>>branching
>>>>>0.92 in order to avoid the disruption of moving the entire source
>>>>>tree around. So I have been holding off on this on my own
>>>>>discretion and any delay sits mostly with me.
>>>>>
>>>>>Of course, that was three months ago and we still haven't branched.
>>>>>In hindsight, if we were aware how long the 0.92 process would go
>>>>>on, I think the thread might have reached a different conclusion.
>>>>>In any case, I think it warrants another discussion.
>>>>>
>>>>>--gh
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
