Seems like a blocker if hbck failure is reproducible even though it happens with 0.92. We know about it now... Thanks Elliott.
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:45 PM, lars hofhansl <lhofha...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> Thanks Elliot! >> I wonder whether this is related to (or the cause of) HBASE-5754? >> > > Sounds bad. Its unrelated to HBASE-5754 I'd say (its -ROOT- rather > than .META.). > St.Ack -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
