On more testing, I'm (a non-binding) +1. Tested on hadoop 2.0.0-alpha and cloudera's cdh3 using Loadtest Tool and acid verification.
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:37 PM, lars hofhansl <lhofha...@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > 0.94.1 should get out of the door soon, though, because of HBASE-6311, > hence (and because this exists in 0.92 and probably 0.90) > > I don't think this should be blocker for 0.94.1. > > +1 on the above from Lars based on the additional comment on HBASE-6461 > > HBCK should be able to get the cluster back in this state, that can be > for 0.94.2. > > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > Hein (via Tom White) >
