I am also +1 (non-binding). I ran some medium sized tests like TestLoadAndVerify (Bigtop's), and they ran fine. Devaraj.
On Jul 27, 2012, at 6:24 PM, Elliott Clark wrote: > On more testing, I'm (a non-binding) +1. > Tested on hadoop 2.0.0-alpha and cloudera's cdh3 using Loadtest Tool and > acid verification. > > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 3:37 PM, lars hofhansl <lhofha...@yahoo.com> >> wrote: >>> 0.94.1 should get out of the door soon, though, because of HBASE-6311, >> hence (and because this exists in 0.92 and probably 0.90) >>> I don't think this should be blocker for 0.94.1. >> >> +1 on the above from Lars based on the additional comment on HBASE-6461 >> >> HBCK should be able to get the cluster back in this state, that can be >> for 0.94.2. >> >> Best regards, >> >> - Andy >> >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet >> Hein (via Tom White) >>
