You can find more detail in: HBase-TRUNK-on-Hadoop-2.0.0 #421 Cheers
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 6:52 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan < [email protected]> wrote: > Is it Ted. I tried to build it was successful for me. > Was it because of some prev trunk compilation? > > > Regards > Ram > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I got the following trying to build trunk: > > > > [ERROR] The build could not read 2 projects -> [Help 1] > > [ERROR] > > [ERROR] The project org.apache.hbase:hbase-server:0.95-SNAPSHOT > > (/Users/tyu/trunk/hbase-server/pom.xml) has 1 error > > [ERROR] 'dependencies.dependency.version' for > > org.apache.hbase:hbase-prefix-tree:jar is missing. @ line 276, column 17 > > [ERROR] > > [ERROR] The project org.apache.hbase:hbase-client:0.95-SNAPSHOT > > (/Users/tyu/trunk/hbase-client/pom.xml) has 1 error > > [ERROR] 'dependencies.dependency.version' for > > org.apache.hbase:hbase-prefix-tree:jar is missing. @ line 61, column 21 > > > > FYI > > > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:19 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I just branched 0.95 from trunk. > > > > > > The intent is that we will now let trunk go and drive to make a 0.95.0 > > > release for folks to bang on so they get to try all the goodness that > has > > > been baking in trunk. After 0.95.0 goes out, dependent on feedback, we > > > might do a 0.95.1, etc., but all strictly experimental odd-number > > releases > > > that are not for production and we reserve the right to break > > compatibility > > > across 0.95 releases (if we've messed something up). > > > > > > Once we have confidence that 0.95.0 basically works, and once we have > > > figured the migration from 0.94, we'll branch 0.96 from off the 0.95 > > branch > > > and will then stabilize a 0.96.0 release. All 0.96.x releases will be > > > taken from this branch off a branch. > > > > > > The 0.95 branch is at > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hbase/branches/0.95 > > > > > > I set up 0.95 builds for hadoop1 and hadoop2. They run on same > triggers > > as > > > TRUNK builds. > > > > > > In JIRA, I moved all issues with fix against 0.96.0 to instead be > against > > > 0.95.0 (Issues marked fix for 0.94 and 0.96 will now just be for 0.95.0 > > -- > > > JIRA wouldn't let me do any different; sorry about that). This means > > > 0.96.0 now has no issues against it. > > > > > > Let me know if I messed anything up. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > St.Ack > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > All the big code moves are done. Let me branch now. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > >> You the man Elliott. This is a big code move so would be good to > > have > > > >> this side of the branch. If you can't do it on the w/e, we can do > it > > > >> post-branch too. > > > >> > > > >> Thanks, > > > >> St.Ack > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Elliott Clark <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> I'll try and get that to you tonight or at least this weekend so > you > > > can > > > >>> branch on schedule. > > > >>> On Feb 22, 2013 4:30 PM, "Stack" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Elliott Clark < > [email protected] > > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Stack <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > When we think APIs and wire-format sufficiently stabilized, > > we'll > > > >>> then > > > >>> > > cut > > > >>> > > > a 0.96 from the 0.95 branch and release 0.96.0, etc., from > here > > > on > > > >>> out. > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > We need to do the client move before the branch. Other than > that > > > >>> sounds > > > >>> > > good. > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > You waiting on me (rpc) Elliott? If so, don't I'd say. I can > > rebase > > > >>> no > > > >>> > problem and I don't see the last part of the rpc going in until > it > > > has > > > >>> had > > > >>> > a good bit more review and a bit of profiling done. > > > >>> > > > > >>> > Agree would be nice getting client refactor in before branch. > Its > > a > > > >>> big > > > >>> > code move. > > > >>> > > > > >>> > St.Ack > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
