The build error was due to version in modules' pom.xml files not being updated.
HBASE-7940 has been logged where I attached patch. Cheers On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 6:55 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > You can find more detail in: HBase-TRUNK-on-Hadoop-2.0.0 #421 > > Cheers > > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 6:52 AM, ramkrishna vasudevan < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Is it Ted. I tried to build it was successful for me. >> Was it because of some prev trunk compilation? >> >> >> Regards >> Ram >> >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > I got the following trying to build trunk: >> > >> > [ERROR] The build could not read 2 projects -> [Help 1] >> > [ERROR] >> > [ERROR] The project org.apache.hbase:hbase-server:0.95-SNAPSHOT >> > (/Users/tyu/trunk/hbase-server/pom.xml) has 1 error >> > [ERROR] 'dependencies.dependency.version' for >> > org.apache.hbase:hbase-prefix-tree:jar is missing. @ line 276, column 17 >> > [ERROR] >> > [ERROR] The project org.apache.hbase:hbase-client:0.95-SNAPSHOT >> > (/Users/tyu/trunk/hbase-client/pom.xml) has 1 error >> > [ERROR] 'dependencies.dependency.version' for >> > org.apache.hbase:hbase-prefix-tree:jar is missing. @ line 61, column 21 >> > >> > FYI >> > >> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:19 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > I just branched 0.95 from trunk. >> > > >> > > The intent is that we will now let trunk go and drive to make a 0.95.0 >> > > release for folks to bang on so they get to try all the goodness that >> has >> > > been baking in trunk. After 0.95.0 goes out, dependent on feedback, >> we >> > > might do a 0.95.1, etc., but all strictly experimental odd-number >> > releases >> > > that are not for production and we reserve the right to break >> > compatibility >> > > across 0.95 releases (if we've messed something up). >> > > >> > > Once we have confidence that 0.95.0 basically works, and once we have >> > > figured the migration from 0.94, we'll branch 0.96 from off the 0.95 >> > branch >> > > and will then stabilize a 0.96.0 release. All 0.96.x releases will be >> > > taken from this branch off a branch. >> > > >> > > The 0.95 branch is at >> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hbase/branches/0.95 >> > > >> > > I set up 0.95 builds for hadoop1 and hadoop2. They run on same >> triggers >> > as >> > > TRUNK builds. >> > > >> > > In JIRA, I moved all issues with fix against 0.96.0 to instead be >> against >> > > 0.95.0 (Issues marked fix for 0.94 and 0.96 will now just be for >> 0.95.0 >> > -- >> > > JIRA wouldn't let me do any different; sorry about that). This means >> > > 0.96.0 now has no issues against it. >> > > >> > > Let me know if I messed anything up. >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > St.Ack >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> > > > All the big code moves are done. Let me branch now. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > >> > > >> You the man Elliott. This is a big code move so would be good to >> > have >> > > >> this side of the branch. If you can't do it on the w/e, we can do >> it >> > > >> post-branch too. >> > > >> >> > > >> Thanks, >> > > >> St.Ack >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Elliott Clark <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> >> > > >>> I'll try and get that to you tonight or at least this weekend so >> you >> > > can >> > > >>> branch on schedule. >> > > >>> On Feb 22, 2013 4:30 PM, "Stack" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >>> >> > > >>> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Elliott Clark < >> [email protected] >> > > >> > > >>> wrote: >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Stack <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > > > When we think APIs and wire-format sufficiently stabilized, >> > we'll >> > > >>> then >> > > >>> > > cut >> > > >>> > > > a 0.96 from the 0.95 branch and release 0.96.0, etc., from >> here >> > > on >> > > >>> out. >> > > >>> > > > >> > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > > We need to do the client move before the branch. Other than >> that >> > > >>> sounds >> > > >>> > > good. >> > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > You waiting on me (rpc) Elliott? If so, don't I'd say. I can >> > rebase >> > > >>> no >> > > >>> > problem and I don't see the last part of the rpc going in until >> it >> > > has >> > > >>> had >> > > >>> > a good bit more review and a bit of profiling done. >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > Agree would be nice getting client refactor in before branch. >> Its >> > a >> > > >>> big >> > > >>> > code move. >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > St.Ack >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >
