Concur. +1 on option #1 and #2, with #1 preferred, -1 on #3. On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 10:10 AM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote:
> So it seems that until we have a stable 0.96 (maybe 0.96.1 or 0.96.2) we > have three options: > 1. Backport new features to 0.94 as we see fit as long as we do not > destabilize 0.94. > 2. Declare a certain point release (0.94.6 looks like a good candidate) as > a "long term", create an 0.94.6 branch (in addition to the usual 0.94.6 > tag) and than create 0.94.6.x fix only releases. I would volunteer to > maintain a 0.94.6 branch in addition to the 0.94 branch. > 3. Categorically do not backport new features into 0.94 and defer to 0.95. > > I'd be +1 on option #1 and #2, and -1 on option #3. > > -- Lars > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
