Do we need to start another thread voting for options 1 and 2 ? We should make a decision soon so that the next 0.94 release can be made.
Cheers On Mar 3, 2013, at 5:50 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > Concur. +1 on option #1 and #2, with #1 preferred, -1 on #3. > > On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 10:10 AM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: > >> So it seems that until we have a stable 0.96 (maybe 0.96.1 or 0.96.2) we >> have three options: >> 1. Backport new features to 0.94 as we see fit as long as we do not >> destabilize 0.94. >> 2. Declare a certain point release (0.94.6 looks like a good candidate) as >> a "long term", create an 0.94.6 branch (in addition to the usual 0.94.6 >> tag) and than create 0.94.6.x fix only releases. I would volunteer to >> maintain a 0.94.6 branch in addition to the 0.94 branch. >> 3. Categorically do not backport new features into 0.94 and defer to 0.95. >> >> I'd be +1 on option #1 and #2, and -1 on option #3. >> >> -- Lars > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White)
