On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 6:10 PM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote:
> So it seems that until we have a stable 0.96 (maybe 0.96.1 or 0.96.2) we > have three options: > 1. Backport new features to 0.94 as we see fit as long as we do not > destabilize 0.94. > 2. Declare a certain point release (0.94.6 looks like a good candidate) as > a "long term", create an 0.94.6 branch (in addition to the usual 0.94.6 > tag) and than create 0.94.6.x fix only releases. I would volunteer to > maintain a 0.94.6 branch in addition to the 0.94 branch. > 3. Categorically do not backport new features into 0.94 and defer to 0.95. > I want us to get to #3. Lets get to 1.0.0 sooner rather than later so we have more numbers to play with (0.96 == 1.0.0?) Regards #1, +1, but how to verify we do not destabilize 0.94? -1 on #2. Just confuses. As has been said already, we'd probably not be having this conversation nor feeling the need to backport features if 0.96 was out. St.Ack
