Myself I used this for various functional and performance tests (millions of rows) over the past days, have observed no issues.
So we have 4 +1's (JM, J-D, Andy, myself), 3 committer +1's. Looks like we all did fairly extensive testing. Enough to release? I think we typically require 5 committers. Should we reduce that requirement for monthly releases with less than 100 fixes? It's a lot to ask to spend multiple days each month to test a new release. -- Lars ----- Original Message ----- From: Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; lars hofhansl <[email protected]> Cc: Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 1:53 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 1st hbase 0.94.7 release candidate is available for download I've been running the RC for a few days doing various things in an all-localhost configuration with a 70 region table (~70 GB data) containing 120 M tweets. Basic testing with LoadTestTool up front also looked good, nothing untoward in the logs. +1 On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:40 AM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: > The 1st 0.94.7 RC is available for download at > http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.7-rc0/ > > Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328 > > This RC has 71 issues resolved against it, contributed by 27 individuals. > 0.94.7 is primarily a bug fix release. Notable exceptions include: > HBASE-8176 Dynamic Schema Configurations > HBASE-7801 Allow a deferred sync option per Mutation > > The full list of changes is available here: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12324039 > > Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin, etc, and > vote +1/-1 by April 24th on whether we should release this as 0.94.7. > > The release testing spreadsheet is available here: > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvLqcVIqNtlTdG9jbVNmWmhyeGJZeUo4MUdIMEEweEE#gid=0 > > Thanks. > > -- Lars -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
