I have no strong preference. #3 is the most expedient way to get the release out.
________________________________ From: Jonathan Hsieh <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; lars hofhansl <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 5:15 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 1st hbase 0.94.7 release candidate is available for download I prefer #3 and then #2. License stuff is not something we should be fast and loose with. On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 5:08 PM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: Arrghhh :) > >I had just sent an email to try to close the vote. >The vote in the next rc is only abridged if we do not pull in any changes made >since the last RC (i.e. we can't use the 0.94 branch for the RC). >Which means we would have to selectively apply this change onto the 0.94.7RC0 >branch. > >Since the rat stuff isn't new. Can we do this in 0.94.8? > >So we have three options (in order of my preference): >1. Ship the RC and fix HBASE-8427 in 0.94.8. 2. Roll a new RC from the 0.94 branch with all the recent changes (including HBASE-8427), and do a full 1-week vote. >3. Apply HBASE-8427 on the 0.94.7RC0 tag and roll a new RC from there with a >1-day vote. > > >-- Lars > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: Jonathan Hsieh <[email protected]> >To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >Cc: lars hofhansl <[email protected]> >Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 4:54 PM >Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 1st hbase 0.94.7 release candidate is available for >download > > >Sorry to do this but: > >-1. Our rat setup was broken and we have a few source files with broken >apache licenses. > >See HBASE-8427. Since isn't a functional change, I'm fine if we have an >extremely abridged vote on the next rc. > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8427<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8427?focusedCommentId=13641177&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-13641193> > > > >On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I've been running the RC for a few days doing various things in an >> all-localhost configuration with a 70 region table (~70 GB data) containing >> 120 M tweets. Basic testing with LoadTestTool up front also looked good, >> nothing untoward in the logs. >> >> +1 >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:40 AM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > The 1st 0.94.7 RC is available for download at >> > http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.7-rc0/ >> > >> > Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328 >> > >> > This RC has 71 issues resolved against it, contributed by 27 individuals. >> > 0.94.7 is primarily a bug fix release. Notable exceptions include: >> > HBASE-8176 Dynamic Schema Configurations >> > HBASE-7801 Allow a deferred sync option per Mutation >> > >> > The full list of changes is available here: >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12324039 >> > >> > Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin, etc, and >> > vote +1/-1 by April 24th on whether we should release this as 0.94.7. >> > >> > The release testing spreadsheet is available here: >> > >> > >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvLqcVIqNtlTdG9jbVNmWmhyeGJZeUo4MUdIMEEweEE#gid=0 >> > >> > Thanks. >> > >> > -- Lars >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> >> - Andy >> >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein >> (via Tom White) >> > > > >-- >// Jonathan Hsieh (shay) >// Software Engineer, Cloudera >// [email protected] > > -- // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) // Software Engineer, Cloudera // [email protected]
