On that note. Did somebody delete the 0.94.7RC0 tag from svn?
________________________________ From: Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; lars hofhansl <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 5:52 PM Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 1st hbase 0.94.7 release candidate is available for download Concur, I'm fine with carrying over my +1 to a new RC that you assert has just licence header changes. On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 5:51 PM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: > I have no strong preference. #3 is the most expedient way to get the > release out. > > > > ________________________________ > From: Jonathan Hsieh <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; lars hofhansl < > [email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 5:15 PM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 1st hbase 0.94.7 release candidate is available > for download > > > > I prefer #3 and then #2. License stuff is not something we should be fast > and loose with. > > > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 5:08 PM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: > > Arrghhh :) > > > >I had just sent an email to try to close the vote. > >The vote in the next rc is only abridged if we do not pull in any changes > made since the last RC (i.e. we can't use the 0.94 branch for the RC). > >Which means we would have to selectively apply this change onto the > 0.94.7RC0 branch. > > > >Since the rat stuff isn't new. Can we do this in 0.94.8? > > > >So we have three options (in order of my preference): > >1. Ship the RC and fix HBASE-8427 in 0.94.8. > 2. Roll a new RC from the 0.94 branch with all the recent changes > (including HBASE-8427), and do a full 1-week vote. > >3. Apply HBASE-8427 on the 0.94.7RC0 tag and roll a new RC from there > with a 1-day vote. > > > > > >-- Lars > > > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > > >From: Jonathan Hsieh <[email protected]> > >To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > >Cc: lars hofhansl <[email protected]> > >Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 4:54 PM > >Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 1st hbase 0.94.7 release candidate is available > for download > > > > > >Sorry to do this but: > > > >-1. Our rat setup was broken and we have a few source files with broken > >apache licenses. > > > >See HBASE-8427. Since isn't a functional change, I'm fine if we have an > >extremely abridged vote on the next rc. > > > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8427< > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-8427?focusedCommentId=13641177&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-13641193 > > > > > > > > > >On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> I've been running the RC for a few days doing various things in an > >> all-localhost configuration with a 70 region table (~70 GB data) > containing > >> 120 M tweets. Basic testing with LoadTestTool up front also looked good, > >> nothing untoward in the logs. > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:40 AM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> > The 1st 0.94.7 RC is available for download at > >> > http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.7-rc0/ > >> > > >> > Signed with my code signing key: C7CFE328 > >> > > >> > This RC has 71 issues resolved against it, contributed by 27 > individuals. > >> > 0.94.7 is primarily a bug fix release. Notable exceptions include: > >> > HBASE-8176 Dynamic Schema Configurations > >> > HBASE-7801 Allow a deferred sync option per Mutation > >> > > >> > The full list of changes is available here: > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE/fixforversion/12324039 > >> > > >> > Please try out the RC, check out the doc, take it for a spin, etc, and > >> > vote +1/-1 by April 24th on whether we should release this as 0.94.7. > >> > > >> > The release testing spreadsheet is available here: > >> > > >> > > >> > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvLqcVIqNtlTdG9jbVNmWmhyeGJZeUo4MUdIMEEweEE#gid=0 > >> > > >> > Thanks. > >> > > >> > -- Lars > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Best regards, > >> > >> - Andy > >> > >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > >> (via Tom White) > >> > > > > > > > >-- > >// Jonathan Hsieh (shay) > >// Software Engineer, Cloudera > >// [email protected] > > > > > > > -- > // Jonathan Hsieh (shay) > // Software Engineer, Cloudera > > // [email protected] > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
