So this is a resounding: "Maybe"? :)
I think we should change the default. HBase should be built from source for a specific version of Hadoop anyway. Ted said +1. Any other opinions? -- Lars ________________________________ From: Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[email protected]> To: dev <[email protected]>; lars hofhansl <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2013 5:13 PM Subject: Re: Default hadoop version for 0.94? That's on my roadmap, but lacking some time for that ;) I bought a new cluster where I will install Hadoop 1.2.1 or 2.x and replicate my current cluster to it, but still need some time to do that :( But the issue is not just me. Me, I can deal with that. But maybe others might be in the same situation? 2013/10/9 lars hofhansl <[email protected]> That's what I was trying to find out :) >You do not want to upgrade to Hadoop 1.2.1? > > >-- Lars > > > >________________________________ > From: Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[email protected]> >To: dev <[email protected]>; lars hofhansl <[email protected]> >Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2013 4:04 PM >Subject: Re: Default hadoop version for 0.94? > > > >Hum. I usually just deploy the .jar on my cluster (hadoop 1.0.3) without >rebuilding anything. Not sure if some others are not doing the same. That >change will break the compatibility with previous version, no? > > > >2013/10/9 lars hofhansl <[email protected]> > >> Should we default the HBase 0.94 builds to Hadoop 1.2.x (1.2.1 currently)? >> It's the current stable release of the Hadoop. Can't even download 1.0.4 >> anymore unless you navigate to the archive section. >> >> This would just apply to the sample packages in the download section for >> HBase. User should really build a targeted version of HBase to their >> version of Hadoop anyway. >> >> Comments? >> >> >> -- Lars >>
