Excellent. Thanks Ted.
2013/10/17 Ted Yu <[email protected]> > bq. Will that make anything faster to have 1.2 as the default version > instead of 1.0? > > You can get to release notes from this thread: > http://search-hadoop.com/m/pFao2kKHDm1 > > A few examples: > > MAPREDUCE-5368 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAPREDUCE-5368>. > Major improvement reported by zhaoyunjiong and fixed by zhaoyunjiong (mrv1) > *Save memory by set capacity, load factor and concurrency level for > ConcurrentHashMap in TaskInProgress* > * > * > HADOOP-8971 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8971>. Major > improvement reported by gopalv and fixed by gopalv (util) > *Backport: hadoop.util.PureJavaCrc32 cache hit-ratio is low for static data > (HADOOP-8926)** > * > > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > I think also we should be able to compile against v1 if required. Don't > > think we should remove the related code yet. Might be on the roadmap, but > > most probably to soon to do that. I'm not +1 because that will impact me > > ;) But can't be -1 (anyway, who cares, I'm not commiter ;) ) > > > > Just one question, that is this going to give us? Will that make anything > > faster to have 1.2 as the default version instead of 1.0? > > > > > > 2013/10/17 Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > > > > > +1, if the current default version of 1 we build against can't even be > > > downloaded except from the archives, that's not good. > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Nick Dimiduk <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 from me as well. Keep on moving forward. > > > > > > > > Does this mean we can delete some old API compatibility code soon? I > <3 > > > > deleting code ;) > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:09 AM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > So this is a resounding: "Maybe"? :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think we should change the default. HBase should be built from > > source > > > > > for a specific version of Hadoop anyway. > > > > > > > > > > Ted said +1. > > > > > > > > > > Any other opinions? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Lars > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > From: Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[email protected]> > > > > > To: dev <[email protected]>; lars hofhansl <[email protected]> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2013 5:13 PM > > > > > Subject: Re: Default hadoop version for 0.94? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's on my roadmap, but lacking some time for that ;) I bought a > > new > > > > > cluster where I will install Hadoop 1.2.1 or 2.x and replicate my > > > current > > > > > cluster to it, but still need some time to do that :( > > > > > > > > > > But the issue is not just me. Me, I can deal with that. But maybe > > > others > > > > > might be in the same situation? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2013/10/9 lars hofhansl <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > That's what I was trying to find out :) > > > > > >You do not want to upgrade to Hadoop 1.2.1? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-- Lars > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >________________________________ > > > > > > From: Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[email protected]> > > > > > >To: dev <[email protected]>; lars hofhansl <[email protected]> > > > > > >Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2013 4:04 PM > > > > > >Subject: Re: Default hadoop version for 0.94? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Hum. I usually just deploy the .jar on my cluster (hadoop 1.0.3) > > > without > > > > > >rebuilding anything. Not sure if some others are not doing the > same. > > > > That > > > > > >change will break the compatibility with previous version, no? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >2013/10/9 lars hofhansl <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > >> Should we default the HBase 0.94 builds to Hadoop 1.2.x (1.2.1 > > > > > currently)? > > > > > >> It's the current stable release of the Hadoop. Can't even > download > > > > 1.0.4 > > > > > >> anymore unless you navigate to the archive section. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> This would just apply to the sample packages in the download > > section > > > > for > > > > > >> HBase. User should really build a targeted version of HBase to > > their > > > > > >> version of Hadoop anyway. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> Comments? > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> -- Lars > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Best regards, > > > > > > - Andy > > > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > Hein > > > (via Tom White) > > > > > >
