+1 from me as well. Keep on moving forward. Does this mean we can delete some old API compatibility code soon? I <3 deleting code ;)
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 11:09 AM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: > So this is a resounding: "Maybe"? :) > > > I think we should change the default. HBase should be built from source > for a specific version of Hadoop anyway. > > Ted said +1. > > Any other opinions? > > > -- Lars > > > > ________________________________ > From: Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[email protected]> > To: dev <[email protected]>; lars hofhansl <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2013 5:13 PM > Subject: Re: Default hadoop version for 0.94? > > > > That's on my roadmap, but lacking some time for that ;) I bought a new > cluster where I will install Hadoop 1.2.1 or 2.x and replicate my current > cluster to it, but still need some time to do that :( > > But the issue is not just me. Me, I can deal with that. But maybe others > might be in the same situation? > > > > > 2013/10/9 lars hofhansl <[email protected]> > > That's what I was trying to find out :) > >You do not want to upgrade to Hadoop 1.2.1? > > > > > >-- Lars > > > > > > > >________________________________ > > From: Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[email protected]> > >To: dev <[email protected]>; lars hofhansl <[email protected]> > >Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2013 4:04 PM > >Subject: Re: Default hadoop version for 0.94? > > > > > > > >Hum. I usually just deploy the .jar on my cluster (hadoop 1.0.3) without > >rebuilding anything. Not sure if some others are not doing the same. That > >change will break the compatibility with previous version, no? > > > > > > > >2013/10/9 lars hofhansl <[email protected]> > > > >> Should we default the HBase 0.94 builds to Hadoop 1.2.x (1.2.1 > currently)? > >> It's the current stable release of the Hadoop. Can't even download 1.0.4 > >> anymore unless you navigate to the archive section. > >> > >> This would just apply to the sample packages in the download section for > >> HBase. User should really build a targeted version of HBase to their > >> version of Hadoop anyway. > >> > >> Comments? > >> > >> > >> -- Lars > >> >
