If we need another RC, then I can do this in the evening Amsterdam time today or tomorrow and run a new vote. I guess at this point it should conclude on April 6?
I wanted to hit a release date of March 31 because Phoenix's 4.0.0 RC depends on having a 0.98.1 available. Of course if there is a veto worthy issue then downstream will be better served by waiting. Also, I will be spinning a 0.98.2 to hit a release date target +30 days from .1. > On Mar 29, 2014, at 12:00 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > After some more testing in secure deployment of 0.98, I found some issue > with cell visibility labels. > Namely: > HBASE-10863 Scan doesn't return rows for user who has authorization by > visibility label in secure deployment > HBASE-10857 clear_auths command gives exception on existing label and user > in secure deployment > > Underneath, they are actually caused by one defect: > DefaultScanLabelGenerator#dropLabelsNotInUserAuths() would erroneously drop > labels due to mismatching username. > > The fix, attached to HBASE-10863, switches to calling user.getShortName() > which is consistent with AccessController in working with Kerberos > principals. > > From users' point of view, it would be expected that cell visibility labels > work in secure deployment. > > I want to solicit opinion on whether RC3 is needed. > If RC3 comes out, I would expect a quick vote. > > Cheers > > >> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> - checked documentation and tarball >> >> - Ran unit test suite which passed >> >> - Ran in local and distributed mode >> - checked the UI pages >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> Unit test suite passes 100% 25 times out of 25 runs. >>> >>> Cluster testing looks good with LoadTestTool, YCSB, ITI, and ITIBLL. >>> >>> An informal performance test on a small cluster comparing 0.98.0 and >>> 0.98.1 >>> indicates no serious perf regressions. See email to dev@ titled >>> "Comparsion >>> between 0.98.0 and 0.98.1RC1 using YCSB". The results are still relevant >>> to >>> this RC. >>> >>> Some of the integration tests have issues when run in local mode but this >>> test only problem can be fixed later. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected] >>>> wrote: >>> >>>> The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available for download >>> at >>>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC2/ and Maven artifacts are >>>> also available in the temporary repository >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1014 >>>> >>>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD. >>>> >>>> The issues resolved in this release can be found here: >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664 >>>> >>>> >>>> This is the last RC expected for this version unless we find a new >>>> blocker. >>>> >>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time >>>> (00:00 -0800 GMT) on March 31 on whether or not we should release this >>> as >>>> 0.98.1. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Best regards, >>>> >>>> - Andy >>>> >>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein >>>> (via Tom White) >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best regards, >>> >>> - Andy >>> >>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein >>> (via Tom White) >> >>
