Ok, RC3 coming up by tomorrow.
> On Mar 29, 2014, at 3:52 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes. > > With HBASE-10863, I change my vote to -1 > > Thanks > >> On Mar 29, 2014, at 7:48 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Ted, is that a -1? >> >>> On Mar 29, 2014, at 2:13 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> HBASE-10863 is a fix that should be included in 0.98.1 >>> >>> W.r.t. Conclusion of voting period of RC3, it is reasonable to have some >>> flexibility. >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>>> On Mar 29, 2014, at 4:14 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> If we need another RC, then I can do this in the evening Amsterdam time >>>> today or tomorrow and run a new vote. I guess at this point it should >>>> conclude on April 6? >>>> >>>> I wanted to hit a release date of March 31 because Phoenix's 4.0.0 RC >>>> depends on having a 0.98.1 available. Of course if there is a veto worthy >>>> issue then downstream will be better served by waiting. >>>> >>>> Also, I will be spinning a 0.98.2 to hit a release date target +30 days >>>> from .1. >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Mar 29, 2014, at 12:00 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> After some more testing in secure deployment of 0.98, I found some issue >>>>> with cell visibility labels. >>>>> Namely: >>>>> HBASE-10863 Scan doesn't return rows for user who has authorization by >>>>> visibility label in secure deployment >>>>> HBASE-10857 clear_auths command gives exception on existing label and user >>>>> in secure deployment >>>>> >>>>> Underneath, they are actually caused by one defect: >>>>> DefaultScanLabelGenerator#dropLabelsNotInUserAuths() would erroneously >>>>> drop >>>>> labels due to mismatching username. >>>>> >>>>> The fix, attached to HBASE-10863, switches to calling user.getShortName() >>>>> which is consistent with AccessController in working with Kerberos >>>>> principals. >>>>> >>>>> From users' point of view, it would be expected that cell visibility >>>>> labels >>>>> work in secure deployment. >>>>> >>>>> I want to solicit opinion on whether RC3 is needed. >>>>> If RC3 comes out, I would expect a quick vote. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> - checked documentation and tarball >>>>>> >>>>>> - Ran unit test suite which passed >>>>>> >>>>>> - Ran in local and distributed mode >>>>>> - checked the UI pages >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Andrew Purtell >>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Unit test suite passes 100% 25 times out of 25 runs. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cluster testing looks good with LoadTestTool, YCSB, ITI, and ITIBLL. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> An informal performance test on a small cluster comparing 0.98.0 and >>>>>>> 0.98.1 >>>>>>> indicates no serious perf regressions. See email to dev@ titled >>>>>>> "Comparsion >>>>>>> between 0.98.0 and 0.98.1RC1 using YCSB". The results are still relevant >>>>>>> to >>>>>>> this RC. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Some of the integration tests have issues when run in local mode but >>>>>>> this >>>>>>> test only problem can be fixed later. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected] >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available for download >>>>>>> at >>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC2/ and Maven artifacts are >>>>>>>> also available in the temporary repository >>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1014 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The issues resolved in this release can be found here: >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This is the last RC expected for this version unless we find a new >>>>>>>> blocker. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time >>>>>>>> (00:00 -0800 GMT) on March 31 on whether or not we should release this >>>>>>> as >>>>>>>> 0.98.1. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Andy >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet >>>>>>>> Hein >>>>>>>> (via Tom White) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Andy >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein >>>>>>> (via Tom White) >>>>>> >>>>>>
