Yes. With HBASE-10863, I change my vote to -1
Thanks On Mar 29, 2014, at 7:48 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > Ted, is that a -1? > >> On Mar 29, 2014, at 2:13 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> HBASE-10863 is a fix that should be included in 0.98.1 >> >> W.r.t. Conclusion of voting period of RC3, it is reasonable to have some >> flexibility. >> >> Cheers >> >>> On Mar 29, 2014, at 4:14 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> If we need another RC, then I can do this in the evening Amsterdam time >>> today or tomorrow and run a new vote. I guess at this point it should >>> conclude on April 6? >>> >>> I wanted to hit a release date of March 31 because Phoenix's 4.0.0 RC >>> depends on having a 0.98.1 available. Of course if there is a veto worthy >>> issue then downstream will be better served by waiting. >>> >>> Also, I will be spinning a 0.98.2 to hit a release date target +30 days >>> from .1. >>> >>> >>>> On Mar 29, 2014, at 12:00 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> After some more testing in secure deployment of 0.98, I found some issue >>>> with cell visibility labels. >>>> Namely: >>>> HBASE-10863 Scan doesn't return rows for user who has authorization by >>>> visibility label in secure deployment >>>> HBASE-10857 clear_auths command gives exception on existing label and user >>>> in secure deployment >>>> >>>> Underneath, they are actually caused by one defect: >>>> DefaultScanLabelGenerator#dropLabelsNotInUserAuths() would erroneously drop >>>> labels due to mismatching username. >>>> >>>> The fix, attached to HBASE-10863, switches to calling user.getShortName() >>>> which is consistent with AccessController in working with Kerberos >>>> principals. >>>> >>>> From users' point of view, it would be expected that cell visibility labels >>>> work in secure deployment. >>>> >>>> I want to solicit opinion on whether RC3 is needed. >>>> If RC3 comes out, I would expect a quick vote. >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> - checked documentation and tarball >>>>> >>>>> - Ran unit test suite which passed >>>>> >>>>> - Ran in local and distributed mode >>>>> - checked the UI pages >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 9:27 AM, Andrew Purtell >>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> +1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Unit test suite passes 100% 25 times out of 25 runs. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cluster testing looks good with LoadTestTool, YCSB, ITI, and ITIBLL. >>>>>> >>>>>> An informal performance test on a small cluster comparing 0.98.0 and >>>>>> 0.98.1 >>>>>> indicates no serious perf regressions. See email to dev@ titled >>>>>> "Comparsion >>>>>> between 0.98.0 and 0.98.1RC1 using YCSB". The results are still relevant >>>>>> to >>>>>> this RC. >>>>>> >>>>>> Some of the integration tests have issues when run in local mode but this >>>>>> test only problem can be fixed later. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected] >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> The 3rd HBase 0.98.1 release candidate (RC2) is available for download >>>>>> at >>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.1RC2/ and Maven artifacts are >>>>>>> also available in the temporary repository >>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1014 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The issues resolved in this release can be found here: >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12325664 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is the last RC expected for this version unless we find a new >>>>>>> blocker. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time >>>>>>> (00:00 -0800 GMT) on March 31 on whether or not we should release this >>>>>> as >>>>>>> 0.98.1. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Andy >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein >>>>>>> (via Tom White) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> - Andy >>>>>> >>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein >>>>>> (via Tom White) >>>>> >>>>>
