To be frank I am mortified at the basic mistake on voting, and the all around dumb stuff I managed to pull off this time around. But I do feel bad about dropping 0.98, was up all night etc, so I humbly reconsider if you'll allow it, and I promise to do a better job.
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 2:01 AM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote: > Getting folks test releases is like pulling teeths, or herding cats, or > getting three kids to agree which song from Frozen is the best :) > > All jokes aside, this *is* a problem. With the goal of more frequent > releases release verification needs to be a smooth process. > I do not know how to fix it, but if we all could just remember to test a > release (and a simple verification does not take much time) that'd help. > > I take some of the blame. And I'll weasel an excuse: HBaseCon. :) > > Please reconsider Andy. It's not always fun, but it's important service to > the community. > > > -- Lars > > > > ________________________________ > From: Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2014 7:54 PM > Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 0.98.2 release candidate (RC0) is > available > > > Actually I do resign as RM for 0.98 effective immediately. > > I've not seen the community before disinterested in a release sufficiently > that not even simple package verification is time worth spending. > > > > On May 12, 2014, at 10:47 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Too late I already put out the artifacts. I thought the release vote is > lazy consensus. If you would like me to resign as RM for 0.98 I will. > > > >> On May 12, 2014, at 9:17 AM, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Hey Andrew, > >> > >> Sorry for the late email here, but -- I believe releases need at least > >> three +1 votes from PMC members[1]. Perhaps people were a bit busy last > >> week due to HBaseCon and we should extend the voting on this release > >> candidate for another week? > >> > >> [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > >> > >> -Todd > >> > >> > >>> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:14 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>> With one +1 and no 0 or -1 votes, this vote has passed. I have sent the > >>> artifacts onward for mirroring and will announce in ~24 hours. > >>> > >>> > >>> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> +1 > >>>> > >>>> Unit test suite passes 100% 25 times out of 25 runs on Java 6u43, > 7u45, > >>>> and 8u0. > >>>> > >>>> Cluster testing looks good with LoadTestTool, and YCSB. > >>>> > >>>> An informal performance test on a small cluster comparing 0.98.0 and > >>>> 0.98.2 indicates no serious perf regressions. See email to dev@titled > >>>> "Comparing the performance of 0.98.2 RC0 and 0.98.0 using YCSB". > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected] > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> The 1st HBase 0.98.2 release candidate (RC0) is available for > download > >>> at > >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.2RC0/ and Maven artifacts > are > >>>>> also available in the temporary repository > >>>>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1020. > >>>>> > >>>>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD. > >>>>> > >>>>> The issues resolved in this release can be found here: > >>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12326505 > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time > >>>>> (00:00 -0800 GMT) on May 7 on whether or not we should release this > as > >>>>> 0.98.2. > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Best regards, > >>>>> > >>>>> - Andy > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > Hein > >>>>> (via Tom White) > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Best regards, > >>>> > >>>> - Andy > >>>> > >>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > Hein > >>>> (via Tom White) > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Best regards, > >>> > >>> - Andy > >>> > >>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > Hein > >>> (via Tom White) > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Todd Lipcon > >> Software Engineer, Cloudera > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
