Here is my late +1 for the release.

 - Checked checksums
 - Checked gpg signature (gpg --verify )
 - Checked included documentation book.html, etc.
 - Running unit tests
 - Started in local mode, run LoadTestTool
 - checked hadoop libs in h1 / h2
 - build src with both hadoop 1 and 2
 - checked directory layouts
 - run local cluster
 - run smoke tests with shell on the artifacts
 - run tests locally on binaries
  -- bin/hbase org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.LoadTestTool -write 10:10:100
-num_keys 1000000 -read 100:30

Enis


On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:19 AM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote:

> Resending... Looks like first attempt did not go through (still Apache
> email issues?).
>
>
>
> ----- Forwarded Message -----
> From: lars hofhansl <[email protected]>
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 11:01 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 0.98.2 release candidate (RC0) is
> available
>
>
>
> Getting folks to test releases is like pulling teeths, or herding cats, or
> getting three kids to agree which song from Frozen is the best :)
>
> All jokes aside, this *is* a problem. With the goal of more frequent
> releases release verification needs to be a smooth process.
> I do not know how to fix it, but if we all could just remember to test a
> release (and a simple verification does not take much time) that'd help.
>
> I take some of the blame. And I'll weasel an excuse: HBaseCon. :)
>
> Please reconsider Andy. It's not always fun, but it's important service to
> the community.
>
>
> -- Lars
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>  From: Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2014 7:54 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 0.98.2 release candidate (RC0) is
> available
>
>
> Actually I do resign as RM for 0.98 effective
>  immediately.
>
> I've not seen the community before disinterested in a release sufficiently
> that not even simple package verification is time worth spending.
>
>
> > On May 12, 2014, at 10:47 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Too late I already put out the artifacts. I thought the release vote is
> lazy consensus. If you would like me to resign as RM for 0.98 I will.
> >
> >> On May 12, 2014, at 9:17 AM, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hey Andrew,
> >>
> >>
>  Sorry for the late email here, but -- I believe releases need at least
> >> three +1 votes from PMC members[1]. Perhaps people were a bit busy last
> >> week due to HBaseCon and we should extend the voting on this release
> >> candidate for another week?
> >>
> >> [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> >>
> >> -Todd
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:14 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> With one +1 and no 0 or -1 votes, this vote has passed. I have sent the
> >>> artifacts onward for mirroring and will announce in ~24 hours.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1
> >>>>
> >>>> Unit test suite passes 100% 25 times out of 25 runs on Java 6u43,
> 7u45,
> >>>> and 8u0.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cluster testing looks good with LoadTestTool, and YCSB.
> >>>>
> >>>> An informal performance test on a small cluster comparing 0.98.0 and
> >>>> 0.98.2 indicates no serious perf regressions.
>  See email to dev@ titled
> >>>> "Comparing the performance of 0.98.2 RC0 and 0.98.0 using YCSB".
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> The 1st HBase 0.98.2 release candidate (RC0) is available for
> download
> >>> at
> >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.2RC0/ and Maven artifacts
> are
> >>>>> also available in the temporary repository
> >>>>>
>  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1020.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
> >>>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12326505
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
> >>>>> (00:00 -0800 GMT) on May 7 on whether or not we should release this
> as
> >>>>> 0.98.2.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ​    - Andy​
> >>>>> ​
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> >>>>> (via Tom White)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Best regards,
> >>>>
> >>>>  - Andy
> >>>>
> >>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> >>>> (via Tom White)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Best regards,
> >>>
> >>>  - Andy
> >>>
> >>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> >>> (via Tom White)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Todd Lipcon
> >> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>

Reply via email to