On May 12, 2014 5:19:35 PM PDT, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> wrote:
>Resending... Looks like first attempt did not go through (still Apache
>email issues?).

+1 

>----- Forwarded Message -----
>From: lars hofhansl <[email protected]>
>To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
>Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
>Sent: Monday, May 12, 2014 11:01 AM
>Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 0.98.2 release candidate (RC0) is
>available
> 
>
>
>Getting folks to test releases is like pulling teeths, or herding cats,
>or getting three kids to agree which song from Frozen is the best :)
>
>All jokes aside, this *is* a problem. With the goal of more frequent
>releases release verification needs to be a smooth process.
>I do not know how to fix it, but if we all could just remember to test
>a release (and a simple verification does not take much time) that'd
>help.
>
>I take some of the blame. And I'll weasel an excuse: HBaseCon. :)
>
>Please reconsider Andy. It's not always fun, but it's important service
>to the community.
>
>
>-- Lars
>
>
>
>________________________________
> From: Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>
>To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
>Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 
>Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2014 7:54 PM
>Subject: Re: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 0.98.2 release candidate (RC0) is
>available
> 
>
>Actually I do resign as RM for 0.98 effective
> immediately.
>
>I've not seen the community before disinterested in a release
>sufficiently that not even simple package verification is time worth
>spending. 
>
>
>> On May 12, 2014, at 10:47 AM, Andrew Purtell
><[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Too late I already put out the artifacts. I thought the release vote
>is lazy consensus. If you would like me to resign as RM for 0.98 I
>will. 
>> 
>>> On May 12, 2014, at 9:17 AM, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hey Andrew,
>>> 
>>>
> Sorry for the late email here, but -- I believe releases need at least
>>> three +1 votes from PMC members[1]. Perhaps people were a bit busy
>last
>>> week due to HBaseCon and we should extend the voting on this release
>>> candidate for another week?
>>> 
>>> [1] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>>> 
>>> -Todd
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:14 AM, Andrew Purtell
><[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> With one +1 and no 0 or -1 votes, this vote has passed. I have sent
>the
>>>> artifacts onward for mirroring and will announce in ~24 hours.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Andrew Purtell
><[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> +1
>>>>> 
>>>>> Unit test suite passes 100% 25 times out of 25 runs on Java 6u43,
>7u45,
>>>>> and 8u0.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cluster testing looks good with LoadTestTool, and YCSB.
>>>>> 
>>>>> An informal performance test on a small cluster comparing 0.98.0
>and
>>>>> 0.98.2 indicates no serious perf regressions.
> See email to dev@ titled
>>>>> "Comparing the performance of 0.98.2 RC0 and 0.98.0 using YCSB".
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Andrew Purtell
><[email protected]
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> The 1st HBase 0.98.2 release candidate (RC0) is available for
>download
>>>> at
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.2RC0/ and Maven artifacts
>are
>>>>>> also available in the temporary repository
>>>>>>
>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1020.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The issues resolved in this release can be found here:
>>>>
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12326505
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific
>Time
>>>>>> (00:00 -0800 GMT) on May 7 on whether or not we should release
>this as
>>>>>> 0.98.2.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ​    - Andy​
>>>>>> ​
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. -
>Piet Hein
>>>>>> (via Tom White)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> 
>>>>>  - Andy
>>>>> 
>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. -
>Piet Hein
>>>>> (via Tom White)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> 
>>>>  - Andy
>>>> 
>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
>Hein
>>>> (via Tom White)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Todd Lipcon
>>> Software Engineer, Cloudera

Reply via email to