+1 on pulling DLR from branch-1
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > I think I may have suggested pulling this from branch-1 and the next > release off that line while leaving it in trunk. Anyway, I'd advocate that, > unless there is consensus we really want to kill it. > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote: > > > What do folks think about removing the current implementation of > > Distributed Log Replay? > > > > The feature has been unstable for a long time and it doesn't look like > > getting it ready for prime time is a priority for anyone right now. As it > > currently stands, it seems like a dangerous sharp edge waiting for any > > unfortunate souls who opt to turn it on. > > > > We could make a tag or perhaps a feature branch that marks the current > > state of the code in trunk, just in case the eventual implementor(s) want > > to start from this code rather than a ground-up redo. > > > > -- > > Sean > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) >
