I would say pull it completely. I can't imagine what it would take for me to feel comfortable with the code that's currently there.
If there's interest we could start a branch and work on a replacement with what's known now. On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 on pulling DLR from branch-1 > > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I think I may have suggested pulling this from branch-1 and the next > > release off that line while leaving it in trunk. Anyway, I'd advocate > that, > > unless there is consensus we really want to kill it. > > > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > What do folks think about removing the current implementation of > > > Distributed Log Replay? > > > > > > The feature has been unstable for a long time and it doesn't look like > > > getting it ready for prime time is a priority for anyone right now. As > it > > > currently stands, it seems like a dangerous sharp edge waiting for any > > > unfortunate souls who opt to turn it on. > > > > > > We could make a tag or perhaps a feature branch that marks the current > > > state of the code in trunk, just in case the eventual implementor(s) > want > > > to start from this code rather than a ground-up redo. > > > > > > -- > > > Sean > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > > > - Andy > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > > (via Tom White) > > >
