Do you guys mean WALPlayer? It seems - no. What code are you referring to? -Vlad
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > DLR is a good idea. We need it. It helps with our MTTR. > > +1 though on pulling the current DLR. Perhaps the current set of issues > could be fixed with some concentrated dev but even then, I'd be wary > turning it on. It is hard to track, distributed all over the code base, and > it extends a foundation that is itself a little shakey (our AM and crash > handling, currently for redo). > > A purge would get rid of a bunch of if/else code and the dropping of > 'special' staging sequence files on region open. > > Lets purge now then come back later with a DLRv2. > > St.Ack > > > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Sean Busbey <[email protected]> wrote: > > > What do folks think about removing the current implementation of > > Distributed Log Replay? > > > > The feature has been unstable for a long time and it doesn't look like > > getting it ready for prime time is a priority for anyone right now. As it > > currently stands, it seems like a dangerous sharp edge waiting for any > > unfortunate souls who opt to turn it on. > > > > We could make a tag or perhaps a feature branch that marks the current > > state of the code in trunk, just in case the eventual implementor(s) want > > to start from this code rather than a ground-up redo. > > > > -- > > Sean > > >
