It will be great if we can use GitHub. It will greatly reduce the difficulty to contribute to HBase.
2018-08-08 3:27 GMT+08:00 Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>: > We can play in this sandbox, and if the majority of contributors and > developers wish to switch to a GitHub-like model, then we should migrate > everything. The only undesirable outcome in my view is a mix of processes > where for some repos we are doing a thing and for core we are still doing > patch-on-JIRA. > > What does yetus integration with gitbox look like? Is there any? > > > On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 12:06 PM Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > > > We recently asked INFRA for two new repositories: hbase-operator-tools > > and hbase-connectors. INFRA noted that this is a self-service task and > > forwarded us to https://gitbox.apache.org. > > > > After setting up the repos, it was plain that gitbox repos are not > > like our git-view mirror of svn repos as we currently have; they are > > connected to github and all github facilities such as PR support and > > pushing from github are supported (compare > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git or our thirdparty > > repo https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase-thirdparty.git to > > the new hbase-connectors repositories, available here, > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase-connectors.git;a=tree, but > > also via github here https://github.com/apache/hbase-connectors). > > > > I asked Infra (Chris Lambertus) what's the story, how it relates to > > our current git: > > > > "Sure you can have repos on both systems (git-wip/svn and GitBox), as > > long as they are different. For instance you wouldn't want > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git AND > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git (which doesn't exist, > > just using for an example). If you'd like to consolidate everything > > onto GitBox, then get a vote on your ML and submit a ticket with the > > vote results as well as any detail. Eventually, we'll be migrating > > everything to GitBox from git-wip. > > > > "GitBox enables writeable GitHub repos, so you can utilize GitHub's > > tools (PRs, merging, etc) while still being able to use GitBox as a > > remote." > > > > This is interesting. In HBASE-21002, a few of us have 'fun' playing > > with the available facility which includes comments in github echoing > > as comments in JIRA. > > > > As our Sean Busbey notes up in one of the repo-creation JIRAs, as a > > community, we don't "support" PRs as part of our current flow. > > > > With our new repos, we have an opportunity to play with the new > > tooling without having to change core behaviors. If we like what we > > see, we might want to consider amending our patch-attached-to-JIRA > > axiom at some point down the road (or of asking to move git core to > > gitbox sooner rather than later). > > > > St.Ack > > > > > -- > Best regards, > Andrew > > Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's > decrepit hands > - A23, Crosstalk >