It will be great if we can use GitHub. It will greatly reduce the
difficulty to contribute to HBase.

2018-08-08 3:27 GMT+08:00 Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>:

> We can play in this sandbox, and if the majority of contributors and
> developers wish to switch to a GitHub-like model, then we should migrate
> everything. The only undesirable outcome in my view is a mix of processes
> where for some repos we are doing a thing and for core we are still doing
> patch-on-JIRA.
>
> What does yetus integration with gitbox look like? Is there any?
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 12:06 PM Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
> > We recently asked INFRA for two new repositories: hbase-operator-tools
> > and hbase-connectors. INFRA noted that this is a self-service task and
> > forwarded us to https://gitbox.apache.org.
> >
> > After setting up the repos, it was plain that gitbox repos are not
> > like our git-view mirror of svn repos as we currently have; they are
> > connected to github and all github facilities such as PR support and
> > pushing from github are supported (compare
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git or our thirdparty
> > repo https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase-thirdparty.git to
> > the new hbase-connectors repositories, available here,
> > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase-connectors.git;a=tree, but
> > also via github here https://github.com/apache/hbase-connectors).
> >
> > I asked Infra (Chris Lambertus) what's the story, how it relates to
> > our current git:
> >
> > "Sure you can have repos on both systems (git-wip/svn and GitBox), as
> > long as they are different. For instance you wouldn't want
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git AND
> > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=hbase.git (which doesn't exist,
> > just using for an example). If you'd like to consolidate everything
> > onto GitBox, then get a vote on your ML and submit a ticket with the
> > vote results as well as any detail. Eventually, we'll be migrating
> > everything to GitBox from git-wip.
> >
> > "GitBox enables writeable GitHub repos, so you can utilize GitHub's
> > tools (PRs, merging, etc) while still being able to use GitBox as a
> > remote."
> >
> > This is interesting. In HBASE-21002, a few of us have 'fun' playing
> > with the available facility which includes comments in github echoing
> > as comments in JIRA.
> >
> > As our Sean Busbey notes up in one of the repo-creation JIRAs, as a
> > community, we don't "support" PRs as part of our current flow.
> >
> > With our new repos, we have an opportunity to play with the new
> > tooling without having to change core behaviors. If we like what we
> > see, we might want to consider amending our patch-attached-to-JIRA
> > axiom at some point down the road (or of asking to move git core to
> > gitbox sooner rather than later).
> >
> > St.Ack
> >
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Andrew
>
> Words like orphans lost among the crosstalk, meaning torn from truth's
> decrepit hands
>    - A23, Crosstalk
>

Reply via email to