Oh, you misunderstood me. It is just for master, you need make sure that
before you killing the old version master, there is no RITs. And once the
new master is up, everything is fine., as the new master will detect if
there are old style AssignProcedure/UnassignProcedures, if so it will quit
immediately.

Sean Busbey <[email protected]> 于2019年1月23日周三 下午9:21写道:

> Yes, please. I don't think it's reasonable to expect no region transitions
> during a rolling upgrade window; that would imply no servers can crash
> during the upgrade.
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019, 07:04 张铎(Duo Zhang) <[email protected] wrote:
>
> > From 1.x it is OK, but from 2.0 or 2.1, we need make sure that there are
> no
> > RITs ongoing. We could see if we can make the upgrading more smoothly.
> >
> > Guanghao Zhang <[email protected]> 于2019年1月23日周三 下午8:56写道:
> >
> > > Our new internal branch is based on branch-2. And we already rolling
> > > upgrade our staging cluster from our internal 0.98 branch to it... I
> will
> > > take a try for 2.0.* to 2.2.0.
> > >
> > > Are you saying we need to make sure it can do this? Or are you
> > > > asserting that it already does?
> > > >
> > > It already does.
> > >
> > >
> > > Sean Busbey <[email protected]> 于2019年1月22日周二 下午9:48写道:
> > >
> > > > excellent! thanks for volunteering to get the 2.2 release line going
> > > > Guanghao!
> > > >
> > > > > Need to add more document about how to rolling upgrade from
> > > > 2.0.* or 2.1.* to 2.2.*. Meanwhile, need document about how rolling
> > > upgrade
> > > > from 1.* to 2.2.*.
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone confirmed that rolling upgrade to 2.2.0 works? I thought
> it
> > > > couldn't because of the change to assignment handling classes?
> > > >
> > > > > Now HBCK2 tool support branch-2's region assignments,
> > > > too.
> > > >
> > > > Are you saying we need to make sure it can do this? Or are you
> > > > asserting that it already does?
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 10:25 PM Guanghao Zhang <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi, all, there has been six months since we released 2.1.0. And
> there
> > > are
> > > > > 429 issues which fixed version is 2.2.0[1]. Our internal branch
> which
> > > > based
> > > > > branch-2 run ITBLL successfully recently. branch-2 is stable now
> and
> > it
> > > > is
> > > > > time to release 2.2.0. I volunteered to be the release manager for
> > the
> > > > 2.2
> > > > > release line. And plan to cut branch-2.2 from branch-2.
> > > > >
> > > > > For 2.2.0, the biggest change is about AMV2[2]: HBASE-20881 is an
> > > > > incompatible change and different implemenation with branch-2.0 and
> > > > > branch-2.1. Need to add more document about how to rolling upgrade
> > from
> > > > > 2.0.* or 2.1.* to 2.2.*. Meanwhile, need document about how rolling
> > > > upgrade
> > > > > from 1.* to 2.2.*. Now HBCK2 tool support branch-2's region
> > > assignments,
> > > > > too.
> > > > >
> > > > > Another features will be included:
> > > > > 1. HBASE-20610 Procedure V2 - Distributed Log Splitting[3]
> > > > > 2. HBASE-21649 Complete Thrift2[4]
> > > > > 3. HBASE-16707 Improve throttling feature for production usage[5]
> > > > > 4. HBASE-20886 [Auth] Support keytab login in hbase client[6]
> > > > > 5. HBASE-20636 Introduce two bloom filter type :
> > ROWPREFIX_FIXED_LENGTH
> > > > and
> > > > > ROWPREFIX_DELIMITED[7]
> > > > >
> > > > > Open a issue HBASE-21747 to release 2.2.0[8]. Suggestions are
> > welcomed.
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > Guanghao
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21746?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.2.0
> > > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20881
> > > > > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20610
> > > > > [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21649
> > > > > [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16707
> > > > > [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20886
> > > > > [7] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20636
> > > > > [8] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21747
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to