thanks for the update. I just built 2.2.0-SNAPSHOT locally. Built well. I
will see if I can deploy it and test it. Else I will wait for Guanghao's
communication.

Le mar. 5 mars 2019 à 20:59, 张铎(Duo Zhang) <[email protected]> a écrit :

> Yes, Guanghao is still working on it. It usually spends more time for a
> minor release than a patch release, as we need to align the git commits and
> the jira issues. And usually there will be a lot of differences...
>
> Sean Busbey <[email protected]> 于2019年3月6日周三 上午9:40写道:
>
> > I believe work on the RC is being tracked in
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21747
> >
> > Looks like an RC is imminent.
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 5, 2019, 14:39 Jean-Marc Spaggiari <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Bump ;)
> > >
> > > Le mar. 5 févr. 2019 à 18:43, Jean-Marc Spaggiari <
> > [email protected]
> > > >
> > > a écrit :
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > When we will have a 2.2.0 RC I will give a try of the upgrade path
> from
> > > > 2.0.x... do we have any idea when this will be out?
> > > >
> > > > JMS
> > > >
> > > > Le mar. 29 janv. 2019 02 h 09, Guanghao Zhang <[email protected]> a
> > > > écrit :
> > > >
> > > >> Cut a new branch-2.2 at this commit.
> > > >>
> > > >> commit e736d78362253936492fb3bd16e614d14859281d
> > > >> Author: Duo Zhang <[email protected]>
> > > >> Date: Mon Jan 28 18:21:51 2019 +0800
> > > >>
> > > >> HBASE-21792 Mark HTableMultiplexer as deprecated and remove it in
> > 3.0.0
> > > >>
> > > >> Signed-off-by: Michael Stack <[email protected]>
> > > >>
> > > >> Sean Busbey <[email protected]> 于2019年1月24日周四 上午9:45写道:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Okay it sounds like we definitely need a better doc about this as
> a
> > > >> > starting point. I have some additional questions about failure
> > > handling;
> > > >> > should we go through them here or in a jira about improving how
> > > upgrade
> > > >> > from 2.0/2.1 gets handled?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019, 07:33 张铎(Duo Zhang) <[email protected]
> > > wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Oh, you misunderstood me. It is just for master, you need make
> > sure
> > > >> that
> > > >> > > before you killing the old version master, there is no RITs. And
> > > once
> > > >> the
> > > >> > > new master is up, everything is fine., as the new master will
> > detect
> > > >> if
> > > >> > > there are old style AssignProcedure/UnassignProcedures, if so it
> > > will
> > > >> > quit
> > > >> > > immediately.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Sean Busbey <[email protected]> 于2019年1月23日周三 下午9:21写道:
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > Yes, please. I don't think it's reasonable to expect no region
> > > >> > > transitions
> > > >> > > > during a rolling upgrade window; that would imply no servers
> can
> > > >> crash
> > > >> > > > during the upgrade.
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019, 07:04 张铎(Duo Zhang) <
> > [email protected]
> > > >> > wrote:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > > From 1.x it is OK, but from 2.0 or 2.1, we need make sure
> that
> > > >> there
> > > >> > > are
> > > >> > > > no
> > > >> > > > > RITs ongoing. We could see if we can make the upgrading more
> > > >> > smoothly.
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > Guanghao Zhang <[email protected]> 于2019年1月23日周三 下午8:56写道:
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > Our new internal branch is based on branch-2. And we
> already
> > > >> > rolling
> > > >> > > > > > upgrade our staging cluster from our internal 0.98 branch
> to
> > > >> it...
> > > >> > I
> > > >> > > > will
> > > >> > > > > > take a try for 2.0.* to 2.2.0.
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > Are you saying we need to make sure it can do this? Or are
> > you
> > > >> > > > > > > asserting that it already does?
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > It already does.
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > Sean Busbey <[email protected]> 于2019年1月22日周二 下午9:48写道:
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > excellent! thanks for volunteering to get the 2.2
> release
> > > line
> > > >> > > going
> > > >> > > > > > > Guanghao!
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > Need to add more document about how to rolling upgrade
> > > from
> > > >> > > > > > > 2.0.* or 2.1.* to 2.2.*. Meanwhile, need document about
> > how
> > > >> > rolling
> > > >> > > > > > upgrade
> > > >> > > > > > > from 1.* to 2.2.*.
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > Has anyone confirmed that rolling upgrade to 2.2.0
> works?
> > I
> > > >> > thought
> > > >> > > > it
> > > >> > > > > > > couldn't because of the change to assignment handling
> > > classes?
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > Now HBCK2 tool support branch-2's region assignments,
> > > >> > > > > > > too.
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > Are you saying we need to make sure it can do this? Or
> are
> > > you
> > > >> > > > > > > asserting that it already does?
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 10:25 PM Guanghao Zhang <
> > > >> > > [email protected]>
> > > >> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > Hi, all, there has been six months since we released
> > > 2.1.0.
> > > >> And
> > > >> > > > there
> > > >> > > > > > are
> > > >> > > > > > > > 429 issues which fixed version is 2.2.0[1]. Our
> internal
> > > >> branch
> > > >> > > > which
> > > >> > > > > > > based
> > > >> > > > > > > > branch-2 run ITBLL successfully recently. branch-2 is
> > > stable
> > > >> > now
> > > >> > > > and
> > > >> > > > > it
> > > >> > > > > > > is
> > > >> > > > > > > > time to release 2.2.0. I volunteered to be the release
> > > >> manager
> > > >> > > for
> > > >> > > > > the
> > > >> > > > > > > 2.2
> > > >> > > > > > > > release line. And plan to cut branch-2.2 from
> branch-2.
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > For 2.2.0, the biggest change is about AMV2[2]:
> > > HBASE-20881
> > > >> is
> > > >> > an
> > > >> > > > > > > > incompatible change and different implemenation with
> > > >> branch-2.0
> > > >> > > and
> > > >> > > > > > > > branch-2.1. Need to add more document about how to
> > rolling
> > > >> > > upgrade
> > > >> > > > > from
> > > >> > > > > > > > 2.0.* or 2.1.* to 2.2.*. Meanwhile, need document
> about
> > > how
> > > >> > > rolling
> > > >> > > > > > > upgrade
> > > >> > > > > > > > from 1.* to 2.2.*. Now HBCK2 tool support branch-2's
> > > region
> > > >> > > > > > assignments,
> > > >> > > > > > > > too.
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > Another features will be included:
> > > >> > > > > > > > 1. HBASE-20610 Procedure V2 - Distributed Log
> > Splitting[3]
> > > >> > > > > > > > 2. HBASE-21649 Complete Thrift2[4]
> > > >> > > > > > > > 3. HBASE-16707 Improve throttling feature for
> production
> > > >> > usage[5]
> > > >> > > > > > > > 4. HBASE-20886 [Auth] Support keytab login in hbase
> > > >> client[6]
> > > >> > > > > > > > 5. HBASE-20636 Introduce two bloom filter type :
> > > >> > > > > ROWPREFIX_FIXED_LENGTH
> > > >> > > > > > > and
> > > >> > > > > > > > ROWPREFIX_DELIMITED[7]
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > Open a issue HBASE-21747 to release 2.2.0[8].
> > Suggestions
> > > >> are
> > > >> > > > > welcomed.
> > > >> > > > > > > > Thanks.
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > Best Regards,
> > > >> > > > > > > > Guanghao
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > > > [1]
> > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21746?jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.2.0
> > > >> > > > > > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20881
> > > >> > > > > > > > [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20610
> > > >> > > > > > > > [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21649
> > > >> > > > > > > > [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-16707
> > > >> > > > > > > > [6] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20886
> > > >> > > > > > > > [7] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20636
> > > >> > > > > > > > [8] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21747
> > > >> > > > > > >
> > > >> > > > > >
> > > >> > > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to