Already filed HBASE-22399 for this, but the first plan is to upgrade to 2.8.5, I think by default we should use the lowest supported minor release line? We could move up to 2.9.x later if 2.8.x is also EOL in newer minor releases.
Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com> 于2019年5月12日周日 下午5:35写道： > I commented on the JIRA. I think there is plenty of time to address this > with an addendum commit. > > For branch-1.4 support for all of 2.7.x is important but for branch-1 > isn’t 2.7 now EOL? > > Should we update the default build version for branch-1 and any 1.5 and up > to 2.9? Latest is 2.9.2 I believe. By commit history this is the most > active 2.x releasing line. 2.8 is seeing occasional update too, but it is > not likely to live as long as 2.9 is my guess. If this is the decision then > no change is needed for branch-1 for the 22048 issue except a change to the > Hadoop version support matrix. > > > > On May 11, 2019, at 11:33 PM, 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Please see the last few comments on HBASE-21048, we breaks the compile > with > > hadoop-2.7.1 and hadoop-2.7.2. We need to address it before RC1 I think. > > > > Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com> 于2019年5月12日周日 上午9:23写道： > > > >> After one week with only one -1 vote it is my estimation this vote has > >> failed and so this RC is withdrawn. > >> > >>> On May 3, 2019, at 6:04 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> > wrote: > >>> > >>> The first HBase 1.4.10 release candidate (RC0) is available for > download > >> at https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.4.10RC0/ and > >> Maven artifacts are available in the temporary repository > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1310 > . > >>> > >>> The git tag corresponding to the candidate is '1.4.10RC0' (8a597e477e). > >>> > >>> A detailed source and binary compatibility report for this release is > >> available for your review at > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hbase/hbase-1.4.10RC0/compat-check-report.html > >> . There are no reported compatibility issues of concern. The changes to > >> Public annotated class MultiRowRangeFilter are reported as low impact by > >> the compatibility checker tool and were discussed and allowed on > >> HBASE-22215. > >>> > >>> A list of the 57 issues resolved in this release can be found at > >> https://s.apache.org/7gSD . > >>> > >>> Please try out the candidate and vote +1/0/-1. > >>> > >>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Unless objection I will > try > >> to close it Friday May 19, 2019 if we have sufficient votes. > >>> > >>> Prior to making this announcement I made the following preflight > checks: > >>> > >>> RAT check passes (7u80) > >>> Unit test suite passes 5/5 (7u80, 8u172) > >>> LTT load 100M rows with 100% verification and 20% updates (8u181) > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Best regards, > >>> Andrew > >>> > >> >
