Filed HBASE-29069.
张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> 于2025年1月12日周日 22:43写道： > > So the decision is to only keep jdk11 + hadoop3 test for branch-2.x > pre commit build? > > For me I think it is OK. > > Istvan Toth <st...@cloudera.com.invalid> 于2025年1月11日周六 20:51写道： > > > > Fine by me. > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 9:41 PM Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > jdk8+hadoop2 precommit tests on branch-2.x, > > > > > > We could, although is anyone still using Hadoop 2? I think we should test > > > JDK8 + Hadoop 3 if we have to pick one combination. > > > > > > 2.x is effectively EOM, no release since 2.10.2 on May 31 2022, according > > > to the Hadoop release download page. It's now going on three years later, > > > to state the obvious. Honestly, no HBase user should be using it -- it's > > > full of CVE documented security issues, either directly or by way of first > > > order dependencies -- unless the HBase+Hadoop service is itself in a > > > legacy > > > or maintenance mode and no further changes are necessary, not even > > > security > > > updates. > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 11:07 AM Istvan Toth <st...@cloudera.com.invalid> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Trying to consolidate the topic on this thread: > > > > > > > > I'd probably keep the jdk8+hadoop2 precommit tests on branch-2.x, the > > > other > > > > combinations have hopefully been tested on master/branch-3 before > > > > backporting. > > > > > > > > Yes, branch-3 and master only run one full test suite as opposed to > > > three. > > > > > > > > We could also disable the new Hadoop version specific tests if we must, > > > or > > > > at least only run them on the oldest supported Hadoop version, and not > > > > on > > > > the intermediate ones. > > > > > > > > Istvan > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 7:16 PM Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 to skipping alternative JDK and Hadoop tests on all branches. > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 9, 2025, at 9:46 AM, Istvan Toth <st...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > > > > > Some ideas to mitigate the queue issues: > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Disable the alternate JDK/Hadoop tests for the precommit PR (any > > > > > > problems would still be discovered later in the nightlies) > > > > > > 2. Stagger the nightly tests: Run 2.5 and 2.6 on odd days, and > > > > branch-2 > > > > > , > > > > > > branch-3 and master on even days > > > > > > > > > > > > The first one is quite simple to do, the second one would be a > > > > > > little > > > > > more > > > > > > involved. > > > > > > > > > > > > WDYT ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > *István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer > > > > *Email*: st...@cloudera.com > > > > cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com> > > > > [image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/> > > > > [image: Cloudera on Twitter] <https://twitter.com/cloudera> [image: > > > > Cloudera on Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> [image: > > > Cloudera > > > > on LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera> > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Best regards, > > > Andrew > > > > > > Unrest, ignorance distilled, nihilistic imbeciles - > > > It's what we’ve earned > > > Welcome, apocalypse, what’s taken you so long? > > > Bring us the fitting end that we’ve been counting on > > > - A23, Welcome, Apocalypse > > > > > > > > > -- > > *István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer > > *Email*: st...@cloudera.com > > cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com> > > [image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/> > > [image: Cloudera on Twitter] <https://twitter.com/cloudera> [image: > > Cloudera on Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> [image: Cloudera > > on LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera> > > ------------------------------ > > ------------------------------
