I see docker failures reported by Yetus both in the nightly tests and
(some) PR checks.

I haven't dug further.

Istvan

On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 8:53 AM Istvan Toth <st...@cloudera.com> wrote:

> If we run a single combination, I'd prefer JDK8+Hadoop3.
>
> That would at least quickly catch any newer features used in the code.
> Running tests with JDK11 only is the least useful combination, as it will
> detect neither JDK8 nor JDK11+ incompatibilities.
>
> Also, if the staggered nightlies fix the queue issues, we don't
> necessatily have to change the PR jobs.
>
> Istvan
>
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2025 at 3:51 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Filed HBASE-29069.
>>
>> 张铎(Duo Zhang) <palomino...@gmail.com> 于2025年1月12日周日 22:43写道:
>> >
>> > So the decision is to only keep jdk11 + hadoop3 test for branch-2.x
>> > pre commit build?
>> >
>> > For me I think it is OK.
>> >
>> > Istvan Toth <st...@cloudera.com.invalid> 于2025年1月11日周六 20:51写道:
>> > >
>> > > Fine by me.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 9:41 PM Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > > jdk8+hadoop2 precommit tests on branch-2.x,
>> > > >
>> > > > We could, although is anyone still using Hadoop 2? I think we
>> should test
>> > > > JDK8 + Hadoop 3 if we have to pick one combination.
>> > > >
>> > > > 2.x is effectively EOM, no release since 2.10.2 on May 31 2022,
>> according
>> > > > to the Hadoop release download page. It's now going on three years
>> later,
>> > > > to state the obvious. Honestly, no HBase user should be using it --
>> it's
>> > > > full of CVE documented security issues, either directly or by way
>> of first
>> > > > order dependencies -- unless the HBase+Hadoop service is itself in
>> a legacy
>> > > > or maintenance mode and no further changes are necessary, not even
>> security
>> > > > updates.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 11:07 AM Istvan Toth
>> <st...@cloudera.com.invalid>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Trying to consolidate the topic on this thread:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I'd probably keep the jdk8+hadoop2 precommit tests on branch-2.x,
>> the
>> > > > other
>> > > > > combinations have hopefully been tested on master/branch-3 before
>> > > > > backporting.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Yes, branch-3 and master only run one full test suite as opposed
>> to
>> > > > three.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > We could also disable the new Hadoop version specific tests if we
>> must,
>> > > > or
>> > > > > at least only run them on the oldest supported Hadoop version,
>> and not on
>> > > > > the intermediate ones.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Istvan
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 7:16 PM Andrew Purtell <
>> andrew.purt...@gmail.com
>> > > > >
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > +1 to skipping alternative JDK and Hadoop tests on all branches.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Jan 9, 2025, at 9:46 AM, Istvan Toth <st...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Hi!
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Some ideas to mitigate the queue issues:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > 1. Disable the alternate JDK/Hadoop tests for the precommit
>> PR (any
>> > > > > > > problems would still be discovered later in the nightlies)
>> > > > > > > 2. Stagger the nightly tests:  Run 2.5 and 2.6 on odd days,
>> and
>> > > > > branch-2
>> > > > > > ,
>> > > > > > > branch-3 and master on even days
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > The first one is quite simple to do, the second one would be
>> a little
>> > > > > > more
>> > > > > > > involved.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > WDYT ?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > > *István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer
>> > > > > *Email*: st...@cloudera.com
>> > > > > cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com>
>> > > > > [image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/>
>> > > > > [image: Cloudera on Twitter] <https://twitter.com/cloudera>
>> [image:
>> > > > > Cloudera on Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> [image:
>> > > > Cloudera
>> > > > > on LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera>
>> > > > > ------------------------------
>> > > > > ------------------------------
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > Best regards,
>> > > > Andrew
>> > > >
>> > > > Unrest, ignorance distilled, nihilistic imbeciles -
>> > > >     It's what we’ve earned
>> > > > Welcome, apocalypse, what’s taken you so long?
>> > > > Bring us the fitting end that we’ve been counting on
>> > > >    - A23, Welcome, Apocalypse
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > *István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer
>> > > *Email*: st...@cloudera.com
>> > > cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com>
>> > > [image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/>
>> > > [image: Cloudera on Twitter] <https://twitter.com/cloudera> [image:
>> > > Cloudera on Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> [image:
>> Cloudera
>> > > on LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera>
>> > > ------------------------------
>> > > ------------------------------
>>
>
>
> --
> *István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer
> *Email*: st...@cloudera.com
> cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com>
> [image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/>
> [image: Cloudera on Twitter] <https://twitter.com/cloudera> [image:
> Cloudera on Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> [image:
> Cloudera on LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera>
> ------------------------------
> ------------------------------
>


-- 
*István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer
*Email*: st...@cloudera.com
cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com>
[image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/>
[image: Cloudera on Twitter] <https://twitter.com/cloudera> [image:
Cloudera on Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> [image: Cloudera
on LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera>
------------------------------
------------------------------

Reply via email to