We can look at the bug fixes in 0.7.0 and see if any feature/bug fix can be
back ported to 0.6.3. Any volunteers for driving 0.6.3 ?

thanks,
Kishore G


On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 2:08 AM, Matthieu Morel <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes, please include these changes, considering 0.7 is not ready yet.
>
> I also remember wondering why josql... and decreasing the number of
> dependencies is always a good thing.
>
> Note that it's a bit tricky to find out which other changes - if any -
> could be interesting for 0.6.x since only a few tickets mention the version
> they affect and the version fix is targeted for.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matthieu
>
>
> On Mar 10, 2014, at 20:44 , Kanak Biscuitwala <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > I think it's important that we do this release. It would include:
> >
> > 1. Compatibility fix for property store
> > 2. Controller pipeline performance improvements
> > 3. New JMX exposed by the controller
> >
> > In addition, I can also port the change that removes the dependency on
> josql if that is desirable.
> >
> > Kanak
> >
> > ----------------------------------------
> >> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 12:38:36 -0700
> >> Subject: [DISCUSS] Do we need 0.6.3 release
> >> From: [email protected]
> >> To: [email protected]
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> While we are working on redefining the new api's in 0.7.0, do we need to
> >> make 0.6.3 release. Is there any one depending on features/bug fixes.
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >> Kishore G
> >
>
>

Reply via email to