Are we including the change to remove josql dependency. I would like that. Not sure if we implemented the removal of rest let. Do we have the list of JIRA's that are part of 0.6.3 ?
thanks Kishore G On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Kanak Biscuitwala <[email protected]>wrote: > I am ready to kick off this release process. I don't believe there are any > outstanding changes that can be backported now. Before I start, are there > any open issues that anyone would really like/need to see in this release? > > Thanks, > Kanak > > ---------------------------------------- > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Do we need 0.6.3 release > > Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 11:07:33 -0700 > > > > > > I've created https://reviews.apache.org/r/19087/ to list these. So far, > I only know of 4 that make sense: josql removal, reviewboard script fixes, > zkgrep, and a test. > > > > Kanak > > > > ---------------------------------------- > >> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 10:50:42 -0700 > >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Do we need 0.6.3 release > >> From: [email protected] > >> To: [email protected] > >> > >> Thanks Kanak. Let us know when you have the list of bug fixes/back ports > >> listed. If anyone wants a change in 0.7.0 back ported to 0.6.3, let us > know. > >> > >> thanks > >> Kishore G > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Kanak Biscuitwala < > [email protected]>wrote: > >> > >>> I can do this. I'm in the process of running tests on the code anyway, > so > >>> I can backport appropriate patches as necessary and get things going. > >>> > >>> Here's a high-level jira for what needs to be done: > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HELIX-402 > >>> > >>> Kanak > >>> > >>> ---------------------------------------- > >>>> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 10:55:47 -0700 > >>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Do we need 0.6.3 release > >>>> From: [email protected] > >>>> To: [email protected] > >>>> > >>>> We can look at the bug fixes in 0.7.0 and see if any feature/bug fix > can > >>> be > >>>> back ported to 0.6.3. Any volunteers for driving 0.6.3 ? > >>>> > >>>> thanks, > >>>> Kishore G > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 2:08 AM, Matthieu Morel <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Yes, please include these changes, considering 0.7 is not ready yet. > >>>>> > >>>>> I also remember wondering why josql... and decreasing the number of > >>>>> dependencies is always a good thing. > >>>>> > >>>>> Note that it's a bit tricky to find out which other changes - if any > - > >>>>> could be interesting for 0.6.x since only a few tickets mention the > >>> version > >>>>> they affect and the version fix is targeted for. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> > >>>>> Matthieu > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Mar 10, 2014, at 20:44 , Kanak Biscuitwala <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I think it's important that we do this release. It would include: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> 1. Compatibility fix for property store > >>>>>> 2. Controller pipeline performance improvements > >>>>>> 3. New JMX exposed by the controller > >>>>>> > >>>>>> In addition, I can also port the change that removes the dependency > on > >>>>> josql if that is desirable. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Kanak > >>>>>> > >>>>>> ---------------------------------------- > >>>>>>> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 12:38:36 -0700 > >>>>>>> Subject: [DISCUSS] Do we need 0.6.3 release > >>>>>>> From: [email protected] > >>>>>>> To: [email protected] > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> While we are working on redefining the new api's in 0.7.0, do we > need > >>> to > >>>>>>> make 0.6.3 release. Is there any one depending on features/bug > fixes. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> thanks, > >>>>>>> Kishore G > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>> > > > >
