I am ready to kick off this release process. I don't believe there are any outstanding changes that can be backported now. Before I start, are there any open issues that anyone would really like/need to see in this release?
Thanks, Kanak ---------------------------------------- > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Do we need 0.6.3 release > Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 11:07:33 -0700 > > > I've created https://reviews.apache.org/r/19087/ to list these. So far, I > only know of 4 that make sense: josql removal, reviewboard script fixes, > zkgrep, and a test. > > Kanak > > ---------------------------------------- >> Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 10:50:42 -0700 >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Do we need 0.6.3 release >> From: [email protected] >> To: [email protected] >> >> Thanks Kanak. Let us know when you have the list of bug fixes/back ports >> listed. If anyone wants a change in 0.7.0 back ported to 0.6.3, let us know. >> >> thanks >> Kishore G >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Kanak Biscuitwala >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> I can do this. I'm in the process of running tests on the code anyway, so >>> I can backport appropriate patches as necessary and get things going. >>> >>> Here's a high-level jira for what needs to be done: >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HELIX-402 >>> >>> Kanak >>> >>> ---------------------------------------- >>>> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 10:55:47 -0700 >>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Do we need 0.6.3 release >>>> From: [email protected] >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> >>>> We can look at the bug fixes in 0.7.0 and see if any feature/bug fix can >>> be >>>> back ported to 0.6.3. Any volunteers for driving 0.6.3 ? >>>> >>>> thanks, >>>> Kishore G >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 2:08 AM, Matthieu Morel <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Yes, please include these changes, considering 0.7 is not ready yet. >>>>> >>>>> I also remember wondering why josql... and decreasing the number of >>>>> dependencies is always a good thing. >>>>> >>>>> Note that it's a bit tricky to find out which other changes - if any - >>>>> could be interesting for 0.6.x since only a few tickets mention the >>> version >>>>> they affect and the version fix is targeted for. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Matthieu >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mar 10, 2014, at 20:44 , Kanak Biscuitwala <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I think it's important that we do this release. It would include: >>>>>> >>>>>> 1. Compatibility fix for property store >>>>>> 2. Controller pipeline performance improvements >>>>>> 3. New JMX exposed by the controller >>>>>> >>>>>> In addition, I can also port the change that removes the dependency on >>>>> josql if that is desirable. >>>>>> >>>>>> Kanak >>>>>> >>>>>> ---------------------------------------- >>>>>>> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 12:38:36 -0700 >>>>>>> Subject: [DISCUSS] Do we need 0.6.3 release >>>>>>> From: [email protected] >>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> While we are working on redefining the new api's in 0.7.0, do we need >>> to >>>>>>> make 0.6.3 release. Is there any one depending on features/bug fixes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> thanks, >>>>>>> Kishore G >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >
