Yep, it was a typo. I meant 20.04. On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 1:34 PM Saad Ur Rahman <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think you may have typo'd 22.04 instead of 20.04, but yes I too feel like > 22.04 is far too new. I am seeing a few libc++ ABI updates on 22.04 but > they seem to be targeting LLVM. My concern is there might be other > dependencies that would limit backward compatibility. > > On Tue., May 10, 2022, 2:07 p.m. Josh Fischer, <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > 22.04 is good with me. I would assume that larger corporations won't be > on > > the bleeding edge of OS distros. > > > > > > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 11:38 AM Saad Ur Rahman <[email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > > Ubuntu 22.04 was just released and has some installation/dependency > > issues. > > > LTS users are probably going to wait till 22.04.1 ( > > > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+milestone/ubuntu-22.04.1) > > > > > > Not sure if 22.04 binaries will be backward compatible. 20.04 has a > > larger > > > userbase and might be forward compatible. > > > > > > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 12:12 PM Josh Fischer <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > I saw a question/statement come across the Heron slack that I think > > > > should be brought to the list for visibility. > > > > > > > > I **think** our convenience binaries for the next Heron release > > > > should include the following. > > > > > > > > - Debian11 Docker image > > > > - Debian11 install script > > > > - Centos7 install script > > > > - Ubuntu 22.04 > > > > - Helm chart > > > > - java client libraries > > > > - Python client libraries > > > > > > > > Previously, we also added a Debian tar.gz of the binaries, but I > think > > we > > > > can skip this as they are included in the install scripts already. > > Did I > > > > miss anything? Any concerns with this? > > > > > > > > > > -- Sent from A Mobile Device
