+1

On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 7:26 PM Nicholas Nezis <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I like those options.
>
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 10:15 PM Josh Fischer <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Let's wait 3 more days for anyone to give input.  Then we can start a
> vote
> > to make a final decision on which containers for us to support.  Keep in
> > mind that even though we do need to plan for Python3 support (There is
> work
> > in progress now) we do not need it as of yet.
> >
> > - Josh
> >
> > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 8:34 PM thinker0 <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > My experience is mainly for CentOS 7, so I think it would be nice if it
> > was
> > > included.
> > >
> > > 2020년 5월 21일 (목) 오전 9:56, Josh Fischer <[email protected]>님이 작성:
> > >
> > > > Well thought out Windham.  I like how you narrowed the criteria down
> to
> > > > Debian10/CentOS7(depending on PY3 support) thinking about overall
> > support
> > > > and what others would need/want.
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > - Josh
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 8:39 PM Windham Wong <
> [email protected]
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > My experience is that, people tends to pick their container image
> OS
> > > > based
> > > > > on few criterias only:
> > > > > 1) image size, alpine always win, then debian/centos and 3rd is
> > > > > ubuntu/centos. alpine is always the smallest but not much library
> > > > provided
> > > > > and require to compile manually. debian is always good because it
> has
> > > > > apt-get to provide loads of library. centos is cool as debian
> because
> > > it
> > > > > also has good yum repo. ubuntu is always the last because it is
> fat,
> > > but
> > > > it
> > > > > provides very large range of libraries to use.
> > > > > 2) kernel feature, as mentioned last email, ubuntu has issue with
> DNS
> > > and
> > > > > some sort of network discover issues. I remember alpine has some as
> > > well,
> > > > > because it is very plain, requires many fine tunes be done
> manually.
> > in
> > > > > this case, centos and debian should win.
> > > > > 3) linux stream, obviously, alpine, debian/ubuntu, centos, are 3
> > > > different
> > > > > streams that use different native tools. Poeple just pick their
> base
> > > > image
> > > > > based on what they often use in their life. However, I see a lot
> > debian
> > > > and
> > > > > alpine on docker hub because they are just smaller in size.
> > > > > 4. library support. Python library is a very good example in this
> > case.
> > > > As
> > > > > Heron is turning to Python 3, which specifically Python 3.7+, some
> > > > > discontinued based OS version does not provide the support anymore.
> > We
> > > > have
> > > > > tested out that, debian9 supports only up to Python3.5, ubuntu
> 14.04
> > > does
> > > > > not support python3 and ubuntu 16.04 supports up to Python 3.5
> only.
> > > > >
> > > > > I am not a big fan of using centos for docker. Concluding all 4
> > points
> > > > > above, I believe keeping centos7 (if it supports python37),
> debian10
> > > (not
> > > > > debian9), ubuntu 18.04 (supports python3.7+) would be the best
> > solution
> > > > at
> > > > > the moment. We have to cut off the old images due to our library
> > > upgrade
> > > > > and this is unavoidable. Otherwise, we would have tons of issues
> > > sending
> > > > in
> > > > > about library support in the future and the workload could be a lot
> > > more
> > > > > for just answering questions.
> > > > >
> > > > > Windham Wong
> > > > > Co-Founder, Technical Director of
> > > > > Stormeye.io, Hong Kong Managed Security Operation Center Limited
> > > > > Email // [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]
> )
> > > > > Phone // +852_3590_2212_|_+852_9832_0707 (tel:+85235902212)
> > > > > Fax // +852_3590_2202 (tel:+852_3590_2202)
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5月 19 2020, at 6:09 早上, Josh Fischer <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > > > Hi All, I think using CentOS and either Debian or Ubuntu is a
> good
> > > > idea.
> > > > > I would pick Debian over Ubuntu for the reason that Nick pointed
> out
> > > in a
> > > > > previous email of DNS issues in Kubernetes. I"ve copy and pasted a
> > > > section
> > > > > of Nick's previous email. ### Start I've run into issues with
> Ubuntu
> > > > images
> > > > > having DNS issues in Kubernetes.
> > > > > https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/787 ### End As for
> what
> > > > ends
> > > > > up being the official Docker container I'm fine with either choice
> > > Debian
> > > > > or CentOS. On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 2:10 AM Ning Wang wrote: > Yeah.
> > For
> > > > > binary release, the license is a huge factor. > > On Sun, May 17,
> > 2020
> > > at
> > > > > 2:32 PM Josh Fischer wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > When it comes to
> > > > choosing
> > > > > the official Apache Docker image for Heron we > > have to think of
> > the
> > > > > licensing issues first. Everything that is > installed > > into the
> > > > > container at build time with the exception of the "FROM" > >
> > statement
> > > in
> > > > > the Dockerfile must be ALv2 compatible. OpenJDK is under > GPLv2 >
> >
> > > > which
> > > > > is not compatible with Apache. However we can get around this if >
> we
> > > > >
> > > > > bring the OpenJDK into the container via a FROM statement. I've
> > copied
> > > a
> > > > >
> > > > > > reply from Dave in our dev list in a previous email. See below.
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ######## Start ######## > > Regarding OpenJDK and GPL2 - here is
> what
> > > > Roman
> > > > > the VP, Legal wrote when > > answering Beam’s questions. > > > >
> > Roman
> > > > > Shaposhnik commented on LEGAL-503: > >
> > > > > ---------------------------------------- > > > > Hey [~altay] if
> you
> > > > would
> > > > > like to continue linking to the Docker release > > artifact from
> the
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > https://beam.apache.org > > you will have: > > 1. Transition to
> the
> > > > > official ASF dockerhub org: > > https://hub.docker.com/u/apache >
> >
> > 2.
> > > > > Start including that binary convenience artifact into your VOTE > >
> > > > threads
> > > > > on Beam releases > > 3. Make sure that all Cat-X licenses are ONLY
> > > > brought
> > > > > into your > > container via FROM statements > > ######## End
> > ######## >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So at the end of the day, we need to use a container that has
> Java
> > >
> > > > > already > > installed in it so that when we create our official
> image
> > > we
> > > > > can inherit > > that java containing image via a FROM statement. >
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > -
> > > > > Josh > > > > > > On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 4:12 PM H W wrote: > > >
> > >
> > > We
> > > > > use Centos 7 as well. > > > > > > On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 10:41 AM
> > > > Nicholas
> > > > > Nezis < > > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > >
> > Some
> > > > > thoughts I'd like to add to the discussion: > > > > > > > > Debian
> > and
> > > > > Ubuntu are somewhat similar. Would it make sense to pick > one > >
> >
> > of
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > those and pair with Centos? > > > > > > > > I've run into
> issues
> > > with
> > > > > Ubuntu images having DNS issues in > > Kubernetes. > > > >
> > > > > https://github.com/kubernetes/kubeadm/issues/787 > > > > > > > >
> > > Ubuntu
> > > > > 14.04 should be removed. It was end of life last year. For > those
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > of
> > > > > > > > > you using Heron in production, is anyone using Ubuntu 16?
> My
> > > > vote >
> > > > > would > > > be > > > > to remove it also. For what it's worth, my
> use
> > > > case
> > > > > is in K8s and we > > use > > > > the Centos7 image on a Centos 7
> OS.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > We should do a test of the official image and helm chart
> > in >
> > > > > Kubernetes > > > > (maybe with Kind https://kind.sigs.k8s.io/ ) as
> > > part
> > > > > of our release > > > > process. This might be nice to add as an
> > > > integration
> > > > > test. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >
> > > On
> > > > > Sun, May 17, 2020, 12:37 PM Ning Wang > wrote: > > > > > > > > >
> That
> > > is
> > > > a
> > > > > good point. We need to adjust the OS version accordingly > > too. >
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 2:28 AM Windham Wong < > >
> > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > debian 10 has no python 2.7 support. Ubuntu 16.04 has no
> > > > python >
> > > > > > 3.7+ > > > > dev > > > > > > library support. hope this helps > >
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > -- > > > > > > Sent from myMail for Android Sunday, 17 May 2020,
> > > 11:34AM
> > > > > +08:00 > > from > > > > > Ning > > > > > > Wang
> [email protected]
> > > : >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > >We have
> talked
> > > > about
> > > > > it a few times in different places. Let's > > make > > > a > > > >
> >
> > >
> > > > > >decision here. We don't have enough resources to support many > >
> > > > docker >
> > > > > > > > > OSes > > > > > > >(technically we only support Debian,
> > Ubuntu,
> > > > and
> > > > > CentOS but each > > of > > > > them > > > > > > >has multiple
> > > versions).
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Things we have agreed on (my
> understanding)
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > >- for binary release, we are going to choose one OS one >
> > > > version. I
> > > > > > > > > > > >remember that Debian 9 was the decision. An open
> > question
> > > > is:
> > > > > do > > we > > > > want > > > > > > to > > > > > > >switch to Debian
> > 10
> > > > now?
> > > > > We haven't had a binary release yet, so > > > there > > > > > is >
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > >still time. As the main target, I think 1. the image should > >
> > > > compile
> > > > > > > > > > > >successfully. and 2 the image should be tested: the
> > tools
> > > > and
> > > > > an > > > > example > > > > > > >topology. > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >-
> > > > for
> > > > > source release, we haven't talked about it very much. > > > >
> > > Personally
> > > > I
> > > > > > > > > > > >feel it is a reasonable expectation that, if we have
> the
> > > > > Docker > > file > > > > in > > > > > > the > > > > > > >core
> folders,
> > > it
> > > > > should at least compile. Otherwise, it's a > failed > > > > build >
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >hence a failed release. We are not going to test run the tools >
> > and
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > examples > > > > > > >for each release though. > > > > > >
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > >Finally, a question about OS versions. I believe at least
> two
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > releases > > > > > > >should be supported because most people don't
> > > > upgrade
> > > > > to the > > latest > > > > > > version > > > > > > >when it is out
> in
> > > more
> > > > > serious scenarios, hence IMO the second > > > oldest > > > > > >
> > could
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >often be more useful than the latest one from a
> convenience
> > >
> > > > > point > > of > > > > > view. > > > > > > >On the other hand, this
> is
> > > too
> > > > > flexible, and we will spend time > > > > thinking > > > > > >
> >about
> > it
> > > > > again. I think a clear guideline could be helpful to > us. > > >
> For
> > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > >example: > > > > > > >- We only include only Debian (popular
> > in
> > > > the
> > > > > server world) and > > > Ubuntu > > > > > > >(popular in servers and
> > > > > workstations). > > > > > > >- for the main OS (Debian) we choose
> the
> > > > latest
> > > > > to compile and > > test > > > > for > > > > > > our > > > > > >
> > >binary
> > > > > release. > > > > > > >- for a given OS, only two versions (most
> > likely
> > > > the
> > > > > most and > the > > > > second > > > > > > >recent releases) are
> > > included
> > > > in
> > > > > the core source code and they > > need > > > to > > > > > be > > >
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > >fixed ASAP if they don't compile. > > > > > > >- OSs and other
> > > versions
> > > > > could be included in a special folder > and > > > but > > > > > >
> > > >there
> > > > is
> > > > > no guarantee that the code will compile. Fixes from the > > > > >
> > > > community
> > > > > > > > > > > >are welcome. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > >How
> > > do
> > > > > you guys think? > > > > > > >--ning > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to