Taking a step back from gz for a moment, and speaking in general: On Sat, 1 Sep 2001, Ian Holsman wrote: > 3rd party modules are invisible to most people, I'll agree with that statement... we can tell ourselves that it's okay to push off modules onto third-party distribution, but the fact is that if it doesn't come as a standard module, people are much less likely to go get it unless they have absolutely no other choice because they either are too lazy, don't know it exists, or fear its stability/security because it's third-party. Perhaps modules distributed through official httpd subprojects are more visible/more trusted, but we don't really know one way or the other on that front yet. --Cliff -------------------------------------------------------------- Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charlottesville, VA
- RE: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Peter J. Cranstone
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Cliff Woolley
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Pier Fumagalli
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Ryan Bloom
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Cliff Woolley
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Pier Fumagalli
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Graham Leggett
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Ian Holsman
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Cliff Woolley
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Jerry Baker
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 William A. Rowe, Jr.
- RE: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Padwa, Daniel
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Ryan Bloom
- RE: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Peter J. Cranstone
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: [PATCH] Add mod_gz to httpd-2.0 Ryan Bloom