Why not use the STATUS file? Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg Ames" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 4:21 PM Subject: Re: 2.0.28-beta release --coredumps
> Ian Holsman wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2001-11-13 at 12:55, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 12:49:50PM -0800, Ian Holsman wrote: > > > > yep... I can get coredumps via this method. > > > > but it doesn't dump core on solaris. > > > > it serves a page weirdly, like the mod-include > > > > is putting the buckets into the bridgade in the wrong order. > > > > > > > > This only happens when both the main file and the included file are > > > > r-proxied. > > > > > > Something funny is happening here. Will try to look tonight. > > > > > > Would you be okay if Greg included something along the lines of > > > "ProxyPass directives may not work with included files. We are > > > researching this." in a Known Problems section of the 2.0.28 > > > release notes? > > > > Yeah... I'm +1 on a beta. > > > > can you include a line like > > "Including a remote file from another remote file via mod-include does > > not currently work" in the known problems. > > cool. > > How about a "httpd-2.0.28-beta.known.issues" file in > /httpd.apache.org/dist/httpd/ ? Then anyone with write permissions can > update it, if other stuff happens to pop up in the future. > > Greg >
