> On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 11:30:49AM -0800, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > Index: server/core.c
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/server/core.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.159
> > diff -u -r1.159 core.c
> > --- server/core.c 6 Mar 2002 18:03:19 -0000 1.159
> > +++ server/core.c 6 Mar 2002 19:52:52 -0000
> > @@ -4040,7 +4040,7 @@
> > AP_FTYPE_NETWORK);
> > ap_subreq_core_filter_handle =
> > ap_register_output_filter("SUBREQ_CORE",
> > ap_sub_req_output_filter,
> > - AP_FTYPE_HTTP_HEADER);
> > + AP_FTYPE_CONTENT + 5);
> > ap_old_write_func = ap_register_output_filter("OLD_WRITE",
> > ap_old_write_filter,
> > AP_FTYPE_CONTENT - 10);
>
> Should we add a new filter type (say AP_FTYPE_CONTENT_SET) where
> SUBREQ_CORE, mod_deflate, mod_headers, etc should go? It would
> be in between AP_FTYPE_CONTENT and AP_FTYPE_HTTP_HEADER (which
> should be renamed to AP_FTYPE_PROTOCOL). The idea is that the
> content-type should be finalized at this filter level. The name
> sucks though. -- justin
As I have said on IRC, and in my long message this morning, yes there
should be. I dislike the name that you have chosen (just as you do),
but I don't have any better ideas either. :-(
Ryan
