Ryan Bloom wrote: >I think 2.0.34 is good enough for a GA release. There are two major >bugs that must be fixed. > >1) error pages have wrong content-type. Wrowe is working on a fix. > >2) autoindex problems. I have fixed the showstopper on my system with >a one-line patch. I just need to fix the HEADER/README ordering >problem. Expect a commit within the hour to fix autoindex completely. > >What else would we need to do to get a GA out of 2.0.34??????? >
We'd need to add 0.0.1 to it, at the very least. :-) It wasn't until 2.0.35 that the bucket free lists were added. Without that code, multiprocessor scalability isn't good enough to qualify as anything other than a beta release, IMO. --Brian
