Agreed, 2.0.34 would need to become HEAD to make this happen. Ryan
---------------------------------------------- Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 645 Howard St. [EMAIL PROTECTED] San Francisco, CA > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian Pane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 9:42 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: I WANT A GA release > > Ryan Bloom wrote: > > >I think 2.0.34 is good enough for a GA release. There are two major > >bugs that must be fixed. > > > >1) error pages have wrong content-type. Wrowe is working on a fix. > > > >2) autoindex problems. I have fixed the showstopper on my system with > >a one-line patch. I just need to fix the HEADER/README ordering > >problem. Expect a commit within the hour to fix autoindex completely. > > > >What else would we need to do to get a GA out of 2.0.34??????? > > > > We'd need to add 0.0.1 to it, at the very least. :-) > It wasn't until 2.0.35 that the bucket free lists > were added. Without that code, multiprocessor > scalability isn't good enough to qualify as anything > other than a beta release, IMO. > > --Brian > >
